These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3850373)

  • 21. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence to the Review Body.
    Clay T
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (377):suppl 1. PubMed ID: 6569339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Money talks.
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Feb; 3(21):13. PubMed ID: 2494550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. True worth.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Dec; (427):3. PubMed ID: 3853100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The PRB has done nurses proud in 1985.
    Osborne R
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Jun; (402):5. PubMed ID: 3847792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. All at sea on pay?
    Webb J
    Nurs Times; 1987 Jan 14-20; 83(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 3643548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gearing up for the next pay review.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):1, 11. PubMed ID: 6565990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Self restraint brings an advantage.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 May; (347):4. PubMed ID: 6563417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The backlash.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 Feb 22-8; 91(8):18. PubMed ID: 7885899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Royal College of Nursing: body blow.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Jul; (356):4. PubMed ID: 6565984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Staff side recommends radical changes for teachers.
    Ellis S
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Nov; (375):1, 12. PubMed ID: 6568446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pay: reviewing the situation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Nov 27-Dec 3; 6(10):18-9. PubMed ID: 1764394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NATN evidence to the Nurses Pay Review Body.
    NATNEWS; 1987 May; 24(5):11. PubMed ID: 3648481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A national perspective.
    Hancock C
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Sep; 10(50):20. PubMed ID: 8868902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. RCM evidence to--the Pay Review Body for nursing and midwifery staffs and the professions allied to medicine 1985.
    Midwives Chron; 1985 Feb; 98(1165):suppl 1-30. PubMed ID: 3844596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pay and conditions: the state of the nursing nation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Oct 21-27; 7(5):18. PubMed ID: 1450020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pay campaign. Working to rules.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 Apr 12-18; 91(15):18. PubMed ID: 7731836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Back to the 80 pound pay target.
    Packham H
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):14-6. PubMed ID: 256096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pay campaign. Striking precedents.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1995 Mar 22-8; 91(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 7716032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.