These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38504108)

  • 1. Shaking table test on seismic performance of a large-span high-rise building.
    Sun L; Bai Y; Lai Z
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6580. PubMed ID: 38504108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structure with Shock Absorber Damper under Pseudo-Dynamic Loads.
    Yip CC; Wong JY; Amran M; Fediuk R; Vatin NI
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Apr; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 35408021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical Modelling of CFS Three-Story Strap-Braced Building under Shaking-Table Excitations.
    Campiche A
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 33383932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Numerical Study on the Seismic Performance of Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls with Steel Sheathing and Gypsum Board.
    Liu S; Feng R; Zhong Y
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 37629976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pseudo-Dynamic Test on Composite Frame with Steel-Reinforced Recycled Concrete Columns and Steel Beams.
    Dong J; Cong X; Ma H; Liu Y; Wang Y
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Sep; 15(18):. PubMed ID: 36143663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geotechnical Seismic Isolation System Based on Rubber-Sand Mixtures for Rural Residence Buildings: Shaking Table Test.
    Yin Z; Sun H; Jing L; Dong R
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Nov; 15(21):. PubMed ID: 36363316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seismic collapse risk of RC-timber hybrid building with different energy dissipation connections considering NBCC 2020 hazard.
    Odikamnoro I; Badal PS; Burton H; Tesfamariam S
    J Infrastruct Preserv Resil; 2022; 3(1):14. PubMed ID: 36366769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical Investigation of the Seismic Performance of Steel Frames with Energy-Dissipating Composite Walls.
    Wei D; Suizi J
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 35160774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of seismic performance and effectiveness of multiple slim-type damper system for seismic response control of building structures.
    Kim D; Sung EH; Park KS; Park J
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():189106. PubMed ID: 25301387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shaking Table Test of a Transfer-Purge Chamber in Nuclear Island Structure.
    Liu X; Li X; Wang X; Wang N; Li Z
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 35160712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced Video-Based Processing for Low-Cost Damage Assessment of Buildings under Seismic Loading in Shaking Table Tests.
    Cataldo A; Roselli I; Fioriti V; Saitta F; Colucci A; Tatì A; Ponzo FC; Ditommaso R; Mennuti C; Marzani A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 37300032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seismic response analysis of super-high-rise building structures with three-layer isolation systems.
    Zhang Y; Guo Z; Liu D; Sun W
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19165. PubMed ID: 37932380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Seismic Response Evaluation of Two-Dimensional Analysis Model with Rigid Joints for RC Frame Buildings.
    Kang JD; Nagae T; Jeong SH; Kajiwara K
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Nov; 15(22):. PubMed ID: 36431513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seismic Performance of Steel-Reinforced Concrete Columns with Q690 High-Strength Steel.
    Wang J; Yi X; Liu Q; Fang X
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Apr; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 35591314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Different Groundwater Levels on Seismic Dynamic Response and Failure Mode of Sandy Slope.
    Huang S; Lv Y; Peng Y; Zhang L; Xiu L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142268. PubMed ID: 26560103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shake Table Testing of an Elevator System in a Full-Scale Five-Story Building.
    Wang X; Hutchinson TC; Astroza R; Conte JP; Restrepo JI; Hoehler MS; Ribeiro W
    Earthq Eng Struct Dyn; 2017 Mar; 46(3):391-407. PubMed ID: 28242957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seismic Performance Evaluation According to HSS and CFST Columns of 3D Frame Buildings with Rubber Friction Bearing (RFB).
    Kim YC; Shahriyer H; Hu JW
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Feb; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 35207824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency Seismic Response for EEWS Testing on Uniaxial Shaking Table.
    Donciu C; Serea E; Temneanu MC
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Apr; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 37190443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specific seismic retrofitting of a compact reinforced concrete building with X-bracings and steel jackets. Application to a primary school in Huelva.
    Romero-Sánchez E; Morales-Esteban A; Requena-García-Cruz MV; Zapico-Blanco B; de-Miguel-Rodríguez J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238505. PubMed ID: 32915839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.