These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38504495)

  • 41. Mental health criminal defenses in persons with neuropsychiatric disorders.
    Frierson RL; Joshi KG
    Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 37966983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Closing forensic psychiatric hospitals in Italy: a new revolution begins?
    Barbui C; Saraceno B
    Br J Psychiatry; 2015 Jun; 206(6):445-6. PubMed ID: 26034177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Competency Restoration for Adult Defendants in Different Treatment Environments.
    Danzer GS; Wheeler EMA; Alexander AA; Wasser TD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Mar; 47(1):68-81. PubMed ID: 30737294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Criminal responsibility evaluations: Benchmarking in different countries.
    Pouls C; Jeandarme I; Al-Taiar H; Bradford J; Canton W; Kristiansson M; Thibaut F; Verreyt V; Konrad N
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 81():101775. PubMed ID: 35066422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Response to Disclosure as an Indicator of Competence to Stand Trial.
    Mossman D; Brown RM; Casey-Leavell BA; Marett CP; Lee ER
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Jun; 46(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 30026398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
    Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluating amnesia for criminal behavior: a guide to remember.
    Scott CL
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):797-819. PubMed ID: 23107564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Bridging the gap between conventional and standardized competency to stand trial (CST) assessments: An examination of defendant answers to conventional CST questions.
    Tarescavage AM; Luna Jones L; Lee TTC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):530-540. PubMed ID: 28857581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Predictor variables in competency to stand trial decisions.
    Cooper VG; Zapf PA
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Aug; 27(4):423-36. PubMed ID: 12916229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Competency restoration: an examination of the differences between defendants predicted restorable and not restorable to competency.
    Hubbard KL; Zapf PA; Ronan KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 12733417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Combined evaluations of competency to stand trial and mental state at the time of the offense: An overlooked methodological consideration?
    Kois L; Wellbeloved-Stone JM; Chauhan P; Warren JI
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):217-229. PubMed ID: 28182458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise].
    Fu PX; Wang J; Shi TT; Hu JN; Zhu MX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 20707283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Tipping the scales of justice: the role of forensic evaluations in the criminalization of mental illness.
    McCallum KE; Gowensmith WN
    CNS Spectr; 2020 Apr; 25(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 31637985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: an American legal perspective.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 18086744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Identifying factors associated with criminal responsibility by analyzing court trial verdicts.
    Shiina A; Sato A; Iyo M; Igarashi Y
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101702. PubMed ID: 33962349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Modern technology permits better "look" into the brains of dangerous criminals].
    Leander G
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Jan; 92(1-2):9, 11-2. PubMed ID: 7830467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Forensic psychiatry in Singapore.
    Chan LG; Tomita T
    Asia Pac Psychiatry; 2013 Dec; 5(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 23857802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Factors that predict murder defendants' competence to stand trial.
    Tartaro C; Duntley J; Medvetz S; Hafner N
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 59():31-37. PubMed ID: 29996985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Juvenile Competency to Stand Trial.
    Stepanyan ST; Sidhu SS; Bath E
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2016 Jan; 25(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 26593118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Forensic psychiatry, neuroscience, and the law.
    Silva JA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):489-502. PubMed ID: 20018997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.