These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38504495)
61. Memory Interventions in the Criminal Justice System: Some Practical Ethical Considerations. Cabrera LY; Elger BS J Bioeth Inq; 2016 Mar; 13(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 26715046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Stakeholder views of a mental health court. McNiel DE; Binder RL Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 20655110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations. Jackson RL; Rogers R; Sewell KW Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 15912724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Neurophilosophical perspectives of neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry-giving way to a paradigm shift? Witzel J; Walter M; Bogerts B; Northoff G Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(1):113-30. PubMed ID: 18327827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Criminal Forensic Psychiatry: A Primer for Psychiatrists. Freeman SA J Clin Psychiatry; 2016 Jun; 77(6):e745. PubMed ID: 27337424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Forensic psychiatric evaluations: an overview of methods, ethical issues, and criminal and civil assessments. Sher L Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2015 May; 27(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25411982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Neurolaw: recognizing opportunities and challenges for psychiatry. Meynen G J Psychiatry Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 41(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26674511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. [The importance of neuropsychological assessment for forensic psychiatric evaluations of defendants]. Schouws SN; Jonker C; Meynen G Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2016; 58(12):872-880. PubMed ID: 27976785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Factors Influencing the Initiation Time of Forensic Psychiatric Assessment of Criminal Cases in Hunan Province. Guo HJ; Wang J; Li QG; Zhong SL; Zhang SM; Zhou JS; Wang XP Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 35(5):586-591. PubMed ID: 31833294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Quantifying the accuracy of forensic examiners in the absence of a "gold standard". Mossman D; Bowen MD; Vanness DJ; Bienenfeld D; Correll T; Kay J; Klykylo WM; Lehrer DS Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 19771499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Forensic psychiatry in Kuwait - characterization of forensic psychiatry patients evaluated over year duration in the only available forensic psychiatry unit. Alhumoud A; Zahid M; Ibrahim S; Syed T; Naguy A Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 60():12-16. PubMed ID: 30217325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The expert and the foreigner: Reflections of forensic transcultural psychopathology on a total of 86 reports by experts on criminal liability. Merzagora I; Amadasi A; Blandino A; Travaini G Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():24-30. PubMed ID: 29548501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: a critical review augmented with research data. Rogers R; Grandjean N; Tillbrook CE; Vitacco MJ; Sewell KW Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(4):503-18. PubMed ID: 11568958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany. Konrad N; Völlm B Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Investigation of verdicts in lawsuits involving competency to stand trial]. Nakajima N Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2006; 108(11):1128-41. PubMed ID: 17313060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. [Law on observation of criminals in forensic psychiatry]. Takeda M Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(12):1571-4. PubMed ID: 20344874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments. Gkotsi GM; Gasser J Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Internationalizing forensic assessments of criminal responsibility. Meynen G; Oei K Med Law; 2011 Dec; 30(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 22397178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Sociodemographic, psychiatric and criminal characteristics of elderly offenders under evaluation for criminal responsibility in Turkey. Tasdemir I; Cesur E; Mengus A; Asliyüksek H; Karamustafalioglu KO Int J Law Psychiatry; 2023; 88():101888. PubMed ID: 37116429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]