These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38504495)
81. Forensic psychiatry in China. Hu J; Yang M; Huang X; Coid J Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 21159382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Mental illness and legal fitness (competence) to stand trial in New York State: expert opinion and criminal defendants' psychiatric symptoms. Lee E; Rosner R; Harmon R J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1008-15. PubMed ID: 24820936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Law & psychiatry: Treatment of incompetent, dangerous criminal defendants: parsing the law. Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 2012 Jul; 63(7):630-2. PubMed ID: 22752031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Influencing factors for assessment of criminal responsibility in patients with mental disorders: A forensic case analysis between 2010 and 2020. Sun D; Wang Q; Xu Y Int J Law Psychiatry; 2023; 86():101854. PubMed ID: 36528930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. [The creation of an instrument to determine competency to stand trial]. Zhang QT; Zhang W; Huo KJ Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004; 20(3):150-1, 154. PubMed ID: 15495807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Characteristics of Misdemeanants Treated for Competency Restoration. Gillis A; Holoyda B; Newman WJ; Wilson MD; Xiong GL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):442-450. PubMed ID: 28003388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. The use of computed tomography scans and the Bender Gestalt Test in the assessment of competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility in the field of mental health and law. Mosotho NL; Timile I; Joubert G Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 50():68-75. PubMed ID: 27289503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. [Closing forensic psychiatric hospitals in Italy: a new deal for mental health care?]. Casacchia M; Malavolta M; Bianchini V; Giusti L; Di Michele V; Giosuè P; Ruggeri M; Biondi M; Roncone R; Riv Psichiatr; 2015; 50(5):199-209. PubMed ID: 26489069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. The charm of structural neuroimaging in insanity evaluations: guidelines to avoid misinterpretation of the findings. Scarpazza C; Ferracuti S; Miolla A; Sartori G Transl Psychiatry; 2018 Oct; 8(1):227. PubMed ID: 30367031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Relationship between comorbidity and violence risk assessment in forensic psychiatry - the implication of neuroimaging studies. Palijan TZ; Radeljak S; Kovac M; Kovacević D Psychiatr Danub; 2010 Jun; 22(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 20562756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Adjudicative competence: evidence that impairment in "rational understanding" is taxonic. Marcus DK; Poythress NG; Edens JF; Lilienfeld SO Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 20822285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations. Warren JI; Murrie DC; Chauhan P; Dietz PE; Morris J Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 15048857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice. Rogers R; Johansson-Love J J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):450-60. PubMed ID: 20018994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. The influence of mental illness and criminality self-stigmas and racial self-concept on outcomes in a forensic psychiatric sample. West ML; Vayshenker B; Rotter M; Yanos PT Psychiatr Rehabil J; 2015 Jun; 38(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 25938621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making. Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Guidelines for determining restorability of competency to stand trial and recommendations for involuntary treatment. Cochrane RE; Laxton KL; Mulay AL; Herbel BL J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1201-1209. PubMed ID: 34032278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Hendricks v. People: forcing the insanity defense on an unwilling defendant. Miller RD J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 12108569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Neuropsychological assessment of competency to stand trial evaluations: a practical conceptual model. Kirkish P; Sreenivasan S J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 10212030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]