These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3850612)

  • 1. When R.N.'s fail to communicate: disaster. Case in point: Lambert v. Sisters of Mercy Health Corp. (369 N.W. 2d 417-IA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Aug; 26(3):2. PubMed ID: 3850612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failure to "fully communicate": catastrophic results. Case in point: Baptist Medical Center v. Wilson 618 So. 2d 1335--AL (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Aug; 34(3):2. PubMed ID: 8198619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Live birth question: wrongful death action. Case in point: Wheeler v. Yettie Kersting Mem. Hosp. (761 S.W. 2d 785--TX (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):4. PubMed ID: 2704835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failure to timely report test results: cause of stillbirth? Case in point: Clancy v. Euclid General Hospital (584 N.E. 2d 763--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):2. PubMed ID: 1594770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensive care nursing: doctor problems. Case in point: Poor Sisters v. Catron (435 N.E. 2d 305 - IN).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1982 Sep; 23(4):4. PubMed ID: 6923436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Employee handbooks: your legal rights. Case in point: Duldulao v. St. Mary of Nazareth Hosp. (505 N.E. 2d 314-IL).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 May; 27(12):2. PubMed ID: 3648826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nurse's attorney denied access to her personnel file. Case in point: Harmon v. Mercy Hospital (460 N.W. 2d 404--ND (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Nov; 31(6):2. PubMed ID: 2267285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurses fail to communicate: death results. Case in point: Hodges v. Effingham County Hosp. Auth. (355 S.E. 2d 104-GA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Jun; 28(1):4. PubMed ID: 3648832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Poor nursing practice": expert opinions. Case in point: Breit v. St. Luke's Memorial Hosp. (743 P. 2d 1254--WA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Dec; 28(7):4. PubMed ID: 3423266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurse refuses to "stay out of it": termination. Case in point: Kirk v. Mercy Hosp. Tri-County 851 S.W. 2d 617--MO (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Jul; 34(2):2. PubMed ID: 8362066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can nurse "diagnose" arrest of labor? Case in point: Ewing v. Aubert (532 So. 2d 876--LA (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Jan; 29(8):2. PubMed ID: 2922482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurse "log rolls" solo: adverse effects. Case in point: Routh v. St. John's Mercy Med. Center (785 S.W. 2d 744--MO (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jul; 31(2):4. PubMed ID: 2377732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The nurse's right of self-defense. Case in point: Theodore v. Dept. of Health & Human Res. (515 So. 2d 454--LA La. App. 1 Cir. 1987).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Feb; 28(9):2. PubMed ID: 3347756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure to use triage slips: death in E.R. Case in point: Montoya v. John Peter Smith Hosp. (760 S.W. 2d 361--TX (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Feb; 29(9):2. PubMed ID: 2928553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurse fails to communicate: catastrophic results. Case in point: White v. Methodist Hospital South 844 S.W. 2d 642--TN (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Apr; 33(11):2. PubMed ID: 8493321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nurses' negligence explored by California court. Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2005 Sep; 22(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 16130833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Failures to follow hospital policies result in patient's death. Case on point: Whittington v. Episcopal Hospital, 2001 WL 114942 A.2d-PA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Mar; 41(10):4. PubMed ID: 11995191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can you be terminated at any time? Case in point: Ewing v. Bd. of Trustees of Pulaska Mem. Hosp. (486 N.E.2d 1094-IN).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Feb; 26(9):2. PubMed ID: 3634411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insensitive nurses precipitate outrageous conduct suit. Case in point: Humana of Kentucky, Inc. v. Seitz (796 S.W. 2d 1--KY (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Dec; 31(7):2. PubMed ID: 2284416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When nurse "blows the whistle": termination. Case in point: Watassek v. Mich. Dept. of Mental Health (372 N.W.2d 617--MI).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Nov; 26(6):2. PubMed ID: 3852353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.