These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38506282)
1. Effect of guided implant placement learning experiences on freehand skills: A pilot study. Carrico C; Skrjanc L; Kanduti D; Deeb G; Deeb JG Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Apr; 10(2):e878. PubMed ID: 38506282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring training dental implant placement using computer-guided implant navigation system for predoctoral students: A pilot study. Golob Deeb J; Bencharit S; Carrico CK; Lukic M; Hawkins D; Rener-Sitar K; Deeb GR Eur J Dent Educ; 2019 Nov; 23(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 31141291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Accuracy and Time for Four Implant Placement Techniques Supporting Fixed-Partial Denture. Deeb JG; Kanduti D; Skrjanc L; Carrico CK; Deeb G J Oral Implantol; 2022 Dec; 48(6):562-572. PubMed ID: 35503961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a dynamic navigation system for training students in dental implant placement. Zhan Y; Wang M; Cheng X; Li Y; Shi X; Liu F J Dent Educ; 2021 Feb; 85(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32914421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in long span edentulous area by novice implant clinicians: A cross-sectional in vitro study comparing fully-guided, pilot-guided, and freehand implant placement protocols. Abduo J; Lau D Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):361-372. PubMed ID: 33817957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of experience on dental implant placement: an in vitro comparison of freehand, static guided and dynamic navigation approaches. Wang X; Shaheen E; Shujaat S; Meeus J; Legrand P; Lahoud P; do Nascimento Gerhardt M; Politis C; Jacobs R Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Oct; 8(1):42. PubMed ID: 36210395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Younis H; Lv C; Xu B; Zhou H; Du L; Liao L; Zhao N; Long W; Elayah SA; Chang X; He L Head Face Med; 2024 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 38745297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique. Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy assessment of implant placement with versus without a CAD/CAM surgical guide by novices versus specialists via the digital registration method: an in vitro randomized crossover study. Li S; Yi C; Yu Z; Wu A; Zhang Y; Lin Y BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):426. PubMed ID: 37370027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does dynamic navigation assisted student training improve the accuracy of dental implant placement by postgraduate dental students: an in vitro study. Yan Q; Wu X; Shi J; Shi B BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):600. PubMed ID: 38778313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and Self-Confidence Level of Freehand Drilling and Dynamic Navigation System of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study. Mampilly M; Kuruvilla L; Tash Niyazi AA; Shyam A; Thomas PA; Ali AS; Pullishery F Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49618. PubMed ID: 38161848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A retrospective study of the accuracy of template-guided versus freehand implant placement: A nonradiologic method. Alevizakos V; Mitov G; Stoetzer M; von See C Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Sep; 128(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 31227455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical performance of dental students using computer-assisted dynamic navigation and freehand approaches. Zhong X; Xing Y; Yan J; Chen J; Chen Z; Liu Q Eur J Dent Educ; 2024 May; 28(2):504-510. PubMed ID: 37941129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandibular region was assisted by dynamic real-time navigation: a retrospective study. Geng N; Ren J; Zhang C; Zhou T; Feng C; Chen S BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):208. PubMed ID: 38336661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study. Chen Z; Li J; Sinjab K; Mendonca G; Yu H; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1186-1194. PubMed ID: 30346631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. Smitkarn P; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Sep; 46(9):949-957. PubMed ID: 31241782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of freehand versus guided immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled trial. Chandran K R S; Goyal M; Mittal N; George JS J Dent; 2023 Sep; 136():104620. PubMed ID: 37454788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]