These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3850759)

  • 1. Inability of caliper measurement to enhance observer agreement in the interpretation of coronary cineangiograms.
    Holder DA; Johnson AL; Stolberg HO; Campbell M; Gunstensen J; Joyal M; Roberts R; Biagioni EM; Vaughan W; Romeo M
    Can J Cardiol; 1985 Jan; 1(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 3850759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of the interpretation of coronary angiography by the simple visual method.
    Guimaraes JA; Victor EG; de Britto Leite MR; Gomes JM; Victor Filho E; Reyes Liveras J
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 74(4):300-8. PubMed ID: 10967582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided interpretation of coronary cineangiograms. Accuracy of automatic detection of stenotic lesions.
    Sugahara T; Yamagihara Y; Sugimoto N; Kimura K; Awano K; Azumi T
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Jan; 33(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 1731845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation in measurement of coronary lesions on 35 and 70 mm angiograms.
    Myers MG; Shulman HS; Saibil EA; Naqvi SZ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 May; 130(5):913-15. PubMed ID: 417590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of measurements of coronary narrowings by videodensitometry and by digital calipers.
    Balkin J; Rosenmann D; Ilan M; Zion MM
    Cardiology; 1992; 81(4-5):238-44. PubMed ID: 1301249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms.
    Detre KM; Wright E; Murphy ML; Takaro T
    Circulation; 1975 Dec; 52(6):979-86. PubMed ID: 1102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Videodensitometry versus digital calipers for quantitative coronary angiography.
    Theron HD; Lambert CR; Pepine CJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 66(17):1186-90. PubMed ID: 2239720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Accuracy of detecting stenotic changes on coronary cineangiograms using computer image processing].
    Sugahara T; Kimura K; Maeda H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 May; 50(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 2388821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital subtraction coronary angiography using high-pass temporal filtration: a comparison with cineangiography.
    Bray BE; Anderson FL; Hardin CW; Kruger RA; Sutton RB; Nelson JA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3884167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a new automatic system for biplane quantitative coronary arteriography.
    Büchi M; Hess OM; Kirkeeide RL; Suter T; Muser M; Osenberg HP; Niederer P; Anliker M; Gould KL; Krayenbühl HP
    Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):93-103. PubMed ID: 2230301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and interobserver variability of coronary cineangiography: a comparison with postmortem evaluation.
    Trask N; Califf RM; Conley MJ; Kong Y; Peter R; Lee KL; Hackel DB; Wagner GS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 May; 3(5):1145-54. PubMed ID: 6707366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of visual estimate with digital caliper measurement of coronary artery stenosis.
    Schweiger MJ; Stanek E; Iwakoshi K; Hafer JG; Jacob A; Tullner W; Gianelly RE
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1987; 13(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 3621336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual interpretation compared with caliper and computerized measurements in experimental vessel stenosis.
    Yanagihara Y; Sugahara T; Fukunishi Y
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):542-5. PubMed ID: 1449877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Problems of detection method of coronary arterial stenosis on cineangiograms by computer image processing].
    Sugahara T; Yanagihara Y; Sugimoto N; Uyama C; Maeda H
    Kokyu To Junkan; 1988 Dec; 36(12):1321-6. PubMed ID: 3074408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography.
    Zir LM; Miller SW; Dinsmore RE; Gilbert JP; Harthorne JW
    Circulation; 1976 Apr; 53(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 1253383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital quantification eliminates intraobserver and interobserver variability in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis.
    Vas R; Eigler N; Miyazono C; Pfaff JM; Resser KJ; Weiss M; Nivatpumin T; Whiting J; Forrester J
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Nov; 56(12):718-23. PubMed ID: 4061294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?
    White CW; Wright CB; Doty DB; Hiratza LF; Eastham CL; Harrison DG; Marcus ML
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Mar; 310(13):819-24. PubMed ID: 6700670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of observer performance with 16 mm cinefluorography and 70 mm camera fluorography in coronary arteriography.
    Björk L; Spindola-Franco H; Van Houten FX; Cohn PF; Adams DF
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Oct; 36(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 1190052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter- and intra-observer variability in the qualitative categorization of coronary angiograms.
    Herrman JP; Azar A; Umans VA; Boersma E; von Es GA; Serruys PW
    Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Mar; 12(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 8847451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmental transit time in coronary arteries with varying degrees of stenosis.
    Melamed R; Aygen M
    Cardiology; 1980; 65(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7363279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.