128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38507963)
1. Letter to the editor about the strategy for performing treponemal tests in reverse-sequence algorithms of syphilis diagnosis: Establishment of a Threshold for Automated Treponemal Screening Tests using the Elecsys Syphilis Assay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
Cherkaoui S; Van den Wijngaert S; Dahma H; Martiny D
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2024 Jun; 109(2):116267. PubMed ID: 38507963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Treponemal Assay Signal Strength Cutoff Ratios To Predict Syphilis Infection.
Bristow CC; Klausner JD
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analytical evaluation of nine serological assays for diagnosis of syphilis.
Malm K; Andersson S; Fredlund H; Norrgren H; Biague A; Månsson F; Ballard R; Unemo M
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2369-76. PubMed ID: 26370737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategy for performing treponemal tests in reverse-sequence algorithms of syphilis diagnosis.
Yi J; Choi W; Shin S; Choi J; Kim H; Chung HJ; Moon HW; Hur M; Yun YM
Clin Biochem; 2019 Jan; 63():121-125. PubMed ID: 30287231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms.
Owusu-Edusei K; Peterman TA; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jan; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20739911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of three automated Treponema pallidum antibody assays for syphilis screening.
Xia CS; Yue ZH; Wang H
J Infect Chemother; 2018 Nov; 24(11):887-891. PubMed ID: 30197093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of Treponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.
Park IU; Fakile YF; Chow JM; Gustafson KJ; Jost H; Schapiro JM; Novak-Weekley S; Tran A; Nomura JH; Chen V; Beheshti M; Tsai T; Hoover K; Bolan G
Clin Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 68(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29986091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The tale of two serologic tests to screen for syphilis--treponemal and nontreponemal: does the order matter?
Owusu-Edusei K; Koski KA; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 May; 38(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 21183862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Elecsys Syphilis Assay for Routine and Blood Screening and Detection of Early Infection.
Kremastinou J; Polymerou V; Lavranos D; Aranda Arrufat A; Harwood J; Martínez Lorenzo MJ; Ng KP; Queiros L; Vereb I; Cusini M
J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 54(9):2330-6. PubMed ID: 27358468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytical Comparison of the Architect Syphilis TP and Liaison Treponema Automated Chemiluminescent Immunoassays and Their Performance in a Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithm.
Sanfilippo AM; Freeman K; Schmitz JL
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Aug; 56(8):. PubMed ID: 29769276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-country comparative study of two treponemal tests for the serodiagnosis of syphilis amongst men who have sex with men (MSM): Chemo-luminescent assay vs Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay.
Gios L; Mirandola M; Cordioli M; Zorzi A; Sherriff N; Vera J; Wlazly D; Hassan-Ibrahim MO; Padovese V; Anabel Darmanin ; Peeling RW; Unemo M; Blondeel K; Toskin I
BMC Infect Dis; 2024 Mar; 24(Suppl 1):313. PubMed ID: 38486194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of a dual non-treponemal/treponemal syphilis point-of-care test to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.
Owusu-Edusei K; Gift TL; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Nov; 38(11):997-1003. PubMed ID: 21992974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening Veterans for Syphilis: Implementation of the Reverse Sequence Algorithm.
Clement ME; Hammouda A; Park LP; Maxwell J; Samoff E; Seña AC; Joyce M
Clin Infect Dis; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1930-1933. PubMed ID: 29020212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis total screen (IgG/IgM) with reflex to an automated rapid plasma reagin test.
Rourk AR; Litwin CM
J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Jun; 33(5):e22878. PubMed ID: 30861169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic Assessment of Reverse Algorithm Syphilis Screening in a High Prevalence Population.
Buono SA; Basurto-Davila R; Godwin HA; Green NM
Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Dec; 45(12):834-841. PubMed ID: 29870503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic point-of-care test for the simultaneous detection of nontreponemal and treponemal antibodies in patients with syphilis.
Castro R; Lopes Â; da Luz Martins Pereira F
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 Aug; 41(8):467-9. PubMed ID: 25013972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Recent Advances in Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis].
Zarakolu P
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Jan; 57(1):141-155. PubMed ID: 36636853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Serodia Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, Captia Syphilis-G, and SpiroTek Reagin II tests with standard test techniques for diagnosis of syphilis.
Pope V; Fears MB; Morrill WE; Castro A; Kikkert SE
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 38(7):2543-5. PubMed ID: 10878040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
