163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3850823)
1. [Abrogation of a labor agreement at the request of a trade union organ].
Marakushev AA
Feldsher Akush; 1985 Aug; 50(8):58-60. PubMed ID: 3850823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The National Labor Relations Act and employment-at-will: the federal preemption docrine revisited.
Zimmerman DA; Howard-Martin J
Labor Law J; 1986 Apr; 37(4):223-34. PubMed ID: 10276868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court, 1978-79--labor relations and employment discrimination.
Modjeska L
Cornell Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 65(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 10245115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Howard's way...hurting nurses?
Dragon N
Aust Nurs J; 2007 Aug; 15(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 17722557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Proactive strategies may prevent union organizing activities.
Vaccaro PL; Bryant MR
Provider; 1993 Nov; 19(11):49-50. PubMed ID: 10129960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A question of authority.
Vaccaro PL; Bryant MR
Provider; 1994 Feb; 20(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 10132004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal regulations of labor-management relations.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1980 Aug; 36(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 10248196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. 1983-1984 Supreme Court term promises significant labor decisions.
Peterson RN
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):20-3. PubMed ID: 10317377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Labor Reform Act of 1977: a detailed analysis.
Nash PG
Employee Relat Law J; 1978; 4(1):59-80. PubMed ID: 10308047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labor law for the nonunion agency.
Gilliland JC
Caring; 1997 Mar; 16(3):14-8, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10166262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NLRB upholds ruling of Beverly harassment.
Burns J
Mod Healthc; 1993 Feb; 23(7):24. PubMed ID: 10124037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Are worker participation plans "labor organizations" within the meaning of Section 2(5)?: a proposed framework of analysis.
Beaver MS
Labor Law J; 1985 Apr; 36(4):226-37. PubMed ID: 10270759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Totality"--right or wrong: the totality trilogy.
Lederer PC
Employee Relat Law J; 1981; 6(4):620-34. PubMed ID: 10250922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concerned about being disciplined? You have the right to union representation.
Mich Nurse; 2002 May; 75(5):15. PubMed ID: 12073488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Union insignia barred: unfair labor practice.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jun; 29(1):1. PubMed ID: 3393686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Employment law and nurses.
Rowden R
Nursing (Lond); 1987 Feb; 3(14):530-2. PubMed ID: 3644184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The National Labor Relations Act: a potential legal constraint upon quality circles and other employer-sponsored employee committees.
Behrens CK; Sollenberger JR
Labor Law J; 1983 Dec; 34(12):776-80. PubMed ID: 10265365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonunion staff has right to representation.
Kruchko JG; Dube LE
Hospitals; 1983 Apr; 57(8):48. PubMed ID: 6832735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Supplementary grounds for the abrogation of a labor agreement].
Marakushev AA
Feldsher Akush; 1985 Nov; 50(11):59-63. PubMed ID: 3853522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding unionization and lawsuits through better communication.
Goodfellow M
Contemp Longterm Care; 1987 Nov; 10(11):100, 102, 104. PubMed ID: 10284797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
