153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38509145)
21. A meta-analysis of Boolean network models reveals design principles of gene regulatory networks.
Kadelka C; Butrie TM; Hilton E; Kinseth J; Schmidt A; Serdarevic H
Sci Adv; 2024 Jan; 10(2):eadj0822. PubMed ID: 38215198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Learning Asynchronous Boolean Networks From Single-Cell Data Using Multiobjective Cooperative Genetic Programming.
Gao S; Sun C; Xiang C; Qin K; Lee TH
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2022 May; 52(5):2916-2930. PubMed ID: 33027020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Enumeration and extension of non-equivalent deterministic update schedules in Boolean networks.
Palma E; Salinas L; Aracena J
Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(5):722-9. PubMed ID: 26520854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Boolean function metrics can assist modelers to check and choose logical rules.
Zobolas J; Monteiro PT; Kuiper M; Flobak Å
J Theor Biol; 2022 Apr; 538():111025. PubMed ID: 35085537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biologically meaningful update rules increase the critical connectivity of generalized Kauffman networks.
Wittmann DM; Marr C; Theis FJ
J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(3):436-48. PubMed ID: 20654629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Attractor detection and enumeration algorithms for Boolean networks.
Mori T; Akutsu T
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2022; 20():2512-2520. PubMed ID: 35685366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Data-Driven Boolean Network Inference Using a Genetic Algorithm With Marker-Based Encoding.
Liu X; Shi N; Wang Y; Ji Z; He S
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(3):1558-1569. PubMed ID: 33513105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Maximum number of fixed points in regulatory Boolean networks.
Aracena J
Bull Math Biol; 2008 Jul; 70(5):1398-409. PubMed ID: 18306974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Boolean networks with multiexpressions and parameters.
Zou YM
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(3):584-92. PubMed ID: 24091393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A framework to find the logic backbone of a biological network.
Maheshwari P; Albert R
BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Dec; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 29212542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Detection of attractors of large Boolean networks via exhaustive enumeration of appropriate subspaces of the state space.
Berntenis N; Ebeling M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Dec; 14():361. PubMed ID: 24330355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Difference equation for tracking perturbations in systems of Boolean nested canalyzing functions.
Dimitrova ES; Yordanov OI; Matache MT
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Jun; 91(6):062812. PubMed ID: 26172759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel constrained genetic algorithm-based Boolean network inference method from steady-state gene expression data.
Trinh HC; Kwon YK
Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(Suppl_1):i383-i391. PubMed ID: 34252959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On Attractor Detection and Optimal Control of Deterministic Generalized Asynchronous Random Boolean Networks.
Van Giang T; Hiraishi K
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(3):1794-1806. PubMed ID: 33301407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Algebraic model checking for Boolean gene regulatory networks.
Tran QN
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():113-22. PubMed ID: 21431552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computing Minimal Boolean Models of Gene Regulatory Networks.
Karlebach G; Robinson PN
J Comput Biol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):117-127. PubMed ID: 37889991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A full bayesian approach for boolean genetic network inference.
Han S; Wong RK; Lee TC; Shen L; Li SY; Fan X
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115806. PubMed ID: 25551820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. LogBTF: gene regulatory network inference using Boolean threshold network model from single-cell gene expression data.
Li L; Sun L; Chen G; Wong CW; Ching WK; Liu ZP
Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 39(5):. PubMed ID: 37079737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always stable.
Kauffman S; Peterson C; Samuelsson B; Troein C
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Dec; 101(49):17102-7. PubMed ID: 15572453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Applying attractor dynamics to infer gene regulatory interactions involved in cellular differentiation.
Ghaffarizadeh A; Podgorski GJ; Flann NS
Biosystems; 2017 May; 155():29-41. PubMed ID: 28254369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
