170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38509508)
1. Cold EMR vs. Hot EMR for the removal of sessile serrated polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ding C; Yang JF; Wang X; Zhou YF; Khizar H; Jin Z; Zhang XF
BMC Surg; 2024 Mar; 24(1):93. PubMed ID: 38509508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li DF; Van Overbeke L; Ohata K; Wang LS; Yao J
Dig Liver Dis; 2022 Nov; 54(11):1486-1493. PubMed ID: 35168877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Sessile Serrated Polyps 10 mm or Larger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Aziz M; Patel HK; Sidhu N; Duvvuri A; Dasari C; Kennedy KF; Ashwath A; Spadaccini M; Desai M; Jegadeesan R; Sathyamurthy A; Vennalaganti P; Kohli D; Hassan C; Pellise M; Repici A; Sharma P; Bourke MJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Oct; 18(11):2448-2455.e3. PubMed ID: 31786330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection is equally effective for sessile serrated polyps and conventional adenomas.
Agarwal A; Garimall S; Scott FI; Ahmad NA; Kochman ML; Ginsberg GG; Chandrasekhara V
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1871-1878. PubMed ID: 28940106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Sessile Serrated Colorectal Polyps ≥10 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Malik TF; Mohan BP; Deliwala S; Kassab LL; Chandan S; Sharma NR; Adler DG
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38019045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video).
Tutticci NJ; Hewett DG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):837-842. PubMed ID: 29133196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis.
Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Spadaccini M; Aziz M; Maselli R; Hassan S; Fuccio L; Duvvuri A; Frazzoni L; Desai M; Fugazza A; Jegadeesan R; Colombo M; Dasari CS; Hassan C; Sharma P; Repici A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 May; 89(5):929-936.e3. PubMed ID: 30639542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic mucosal resection using cold snare versus hot snare in treatment for 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: protocol of a non-inferiority randomised controlled study.
Jiang Q; Yan X; Wang D; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Feng Y; Yang A; Wu D
BMJ Open; 2023 May; 13(5):e070321. PubMed ID: 37217262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.
Mangira D; Raftopoulos S; Vogrin S; Hartley I; Mack A; Gazelakis K; Nalankilli K; Trinh A; Metz AJ; Appleyard M; Grimpen F; Elliott T; Brown G; Moss A
Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 36750222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative efficacy and safety of resection techniques for treating 6 to 20mm, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Tziatzios G; Papaefthymiou A; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Marco S; Frazzoni L; Fuccio L; Paraskeva KD; Hassan C; Repici A; Sharma P; Rex DK; Triantafyllou K; Messmann H; Gkolfakis P
Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jul; 55(7):856-864. PubMed ID: 36336608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rotermund C; Djinbachian R; Taghiakbari M; Enderle MD; Eickhoff A; von Renteln D
World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 28(29):4007-4018. PubMed ID: 36157546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal sessile polyps.
Sato Y; Ozawa SI; Yasuda H; Kato M; Kiyokawa H; Yamashita M; Matsuo Y; Yamamoto H; Itoh F
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1820-1826. PubMed ID: 32356110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large serrated lesions in comparison with adenomas: a prospective multicentre study of 2000 lesions.
Pellise M; Burgess NG; Tutticci N; Hourigan LF; Zanati SA; Brown GJ; Singh R; Williams SJ; Raftopoulos SC; Ormonde D; Moss A; Byth K; P'Ng H; Mahajan H; McLeod D; Bourke MJ
Gut; 2017 Apr; 66(4):644-653. PubMed ID: 26786685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy with submucosal injection for the removal of polyps less than 20 mm in size: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang Z; Wei Y; Zhang S; Li P
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Nov; 38(11):1892-1899. PubMed ID: 37608577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of cold-snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal adenomas 10 to 14 mm in size: a prospective observational study.
Yabuuchi Y; Imai K; Hotta K; Ito S; Kishida Y; Yoshida M; Kawata N; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Ishiwatari H; Matsubayashi H; Aizawa D; Oishi T; Imai T; Ono H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Dec; 92(6):1239-1246. PubMed ID: 32464143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Mehta D; Loutfy AH; Kushnir VM; Faulx AL; Smith ZL
Endoscopy; 2022 Apr; 54(4):367-375. PubMed ID: 33782926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
