126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38509805)
1. Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears.
Beck RL; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Ketterer MC
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 38509805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrode array design determines scalar position, dislocation rate and angle and postoperative speech perception.
Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Beck R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Sep; 279(9):4257-4267. PubMed ID: 34778920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array.
Beck R; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Rauch AK; Ketterer MC
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 37773530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiological evaluation of a new straight electrode array compared to its precursors.
Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Speck I; Rauch AK; Beck R; Hassepass F
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3707-3714. PubMed ID: 33090276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes.
Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP; Giardina CK; Buss E; Brown KD; Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA; Adunka OF; Fitzpatrick DC
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):941-948. PubMed ID: 33369942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Electrode Position on Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Measurements in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implants.
Collins A; Foghsgaard S; Druce E; Margani V; Mejia O; O'Leary S
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 38238914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Electrodes Using Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Yamamoto N; Okano T; Yamazaki H; Hiraumi H; Sakamoto T; Ito J; Omori K
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 30624399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visualization of Different Types of Cochlear Implants in Postoperative Cone-Beam CT Imaging.
Burck I; Drath F; Albrecht MH; D Angelo T; Ackermann H; Scholtz JE; Yel I; Stöver T; Helbig S; Vogl TJ; Kaltenbach B; Scholtz JE
Acad Radiol; 2022 Mar; 29 Suppl 3():S88-S97. PubMed ID: 33840600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with slim modiolar electrode.
Iso-Mustajärvi M; Sipari S; Löppönen H; Dietz A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 277(2):367-375. PubMed ID: 31673779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implantation and Outcome in Residual Hearing and Vestibular Function.
Nordfalk KF; Rasmussen K; Hopp E; Bunne M; Silvola JT; Jablonski GE
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e129-37. PubMed ID: 26524566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes.
Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Role of Electrode Placement in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients.
De Seta D; Nguyen Y; Bonnard D; Ferrary E; Godey B; Bakhos D; Mondain M; Deguine O; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Mosnier I
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 155(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 27165685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved auditory performance of cochlear implant patients using the middle fossa approach.
Colletti V; Fiorino FG; Saccetto L; Giarbini N; Carner M
Audiology; 1999; 38(4):225-34. PubMed ID: 10431908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
