These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38510744)

  • 1. Prognostic differences between physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and optimal medical therapy in coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Islam U; Sabbah M; Özbek BT; Madsen JM; Lønborg JT; Engstrøm T
    Am Heart J Plus; 2024 Feb; 38():100362. PubMed ID: 38510744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Andersen BK; Ding D; Mogensen LJH; Tu S; Holm NR; Westra J; Wijns W
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2023 Feb; 9(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 36026514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fractional flow reserve use in coronary artery revascularization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sanz Sánchez J; Farjat Pasos JI; Martinez Solé J; Hussain B; Kumar S; Garg M; Chiarito M; Teira Calderón A; Sorolla-Romero JA; Echavarria Pinto M; Shin ES; Diez Gil JL; Waksman R; van de Hoef TP; Garcia-Garcia HM
    iScience; 2023 Aug; 26(8):107245. PubMed ID: 37520737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
    Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wolfrum M; Fahrni G; de Maria GL; Knapp G; Curzen N; Kharbanda RK; Fröhlich GM; Banning AP
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Sep; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27608682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy based on gray-zone fractional flow reserve in stable angina patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis (COMFORTABLE prospective study): Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Kitabata H; Kubo T; Shiono Y; Shimamura K; Ino Y; Tanimoto T; Hayashi Y; Komukai K; Sougawa H; Kimura K; Gohda M; Hashizume T; Obana M; Maeda K; Yamaguchi J; Akasaka T
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30691507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography alone in guiding myocardial revascularisation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Elbadawi A; Sedhom R; Dang AT; Gad MM; Rahman F; Brilakis ES; Elgendy IY; Jneid H
    Heart; 2022 Oct; 108(21):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 35568392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal Treatment Strategy for Coronary Artery Stenoses with Grey Zone Fractional Flow Reserve Values. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Andreou C; Zimmermann FM; Tonino PAL; Maniotis C; Koutouzis M; Poulimenos LE; Triantafyllis AS
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Mar; 21(3):392-397. PubMed ID: 31227391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve guided complete revascularization versus infarct related artery only revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Neupane S; Singh H; Edla S; Altujjar M; Yamsaki H; Lalonde T; Rosman HS; Eggebrecht H; Mehta RH
    Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Sep; 30(6):393-397. PubMed ID: 31094897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients With Multivessel Disease.
    Di Gioia G; Soto Flores N; Franco D; Colaiori I; Sonck J; Gigante C; Kodeboina M; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Van Praet F; Casselman F; Degriek I; Stockman B; Barbato E; Collet C; De Bruyne B
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Oct; 13(10):e009157. PubMed ID: 33040579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing treatment outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xiu J; Chen G; Zheng H; Wang Y; Chen H; Liu X; Wu J; Bin J
    Clin Invest Med; 2016 Feb; 39(1):E25-36. PubMed ID: 26833170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography-guided strategy in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a randomized trial.
    Lee JM; Kim HK; Park KH; Choo EH; Kim CJ; Lee SH; Kim MC; Hong YJ; Ahn SG; Doh JH; Lee SY; Park SD; Lee HJ; Kang MG; Koh JS; Cho YK; Nam CW; Koo BK; Lee BK; Yun KH; Hong D; Joh HS; Choi KH; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Hahn JY;
    Eur Heart J; 2023 Feb; 44(6):473-484. PubMed ID: 36540034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angiography versus FFR guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization for patients presenting with STEMI: Network meta-analysis.
    Okuya Y; Gohil K; Moussa ID
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 100(3):340-350. PubMed ID: 35789058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang D; Lv S; Song X; Yuan F; Xu F; Zhang M; Yan S; Cao X
    Heart; 2015 Mar; 101(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 25637372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FFR- Versus Angiography-Guided Revascularization for Nonculprit Stenosis in STEMI and Multivessel Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Elbadawi A; Dang AT; Hamed M; Eid M; Prakash Hiriyur Prakash M; Saleh M; Gad M; Mamas MA; Rahman F; Elgendy IY
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 15(6):656-666. PubMed ID: 35331458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies.
    Garcia S; Sandoval Y; Roukoz H; Adabag S; Canoniero M; Yannopoulos D; Brilakis ES
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1421-31. PubMed ID: 23747787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic Value of Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the FAME 3 Trial.
    Piroth Z; Otsuki H; Zimmermann FM; Ferenci T; Keulards DCJ; Yeung AC; Pijls NHJ; De Bruyne B; Fearon WF
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 15(11):884-891. PubMed ID: 36121706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.