These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38512189)

  • 1. Young children and adults use reasoning by exclusion rather than attraction to novelty to disambiguate novel word meanings.
    Bleijlevens N; Behne T
    Dev Psychol; 2024 Jul; 60(7):1313-1330. PubMed ID: 38512189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pragmatics aid referent disambiguation and word learning in young children and adults.
    Bleijlevens N; Contier F; Behne T
    Dev Sci; 2023 Jul; 26(4):e13363. PubMed ID: 36598874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is It a Name or a Fact? Disambiguation of Reference Via Exclusivity and Pragmatic Reasoning.
    Malone SA; Kalashnikova M; Davis EM
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 40(8):2095-2107. PubMed ID: 26523862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Young children's disambiguation of object name reference.
    Merriman WE; Schuster JM
    Child Dev; 1991 Dec; 62(6):1288-301. PubMed ID: 1786716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When slowing down processing helps learning: Lexico-semantic structure supports retention, but interferes with disambiguation of novel object-label mappings.
    Borovsky A
    Dev Sci; 2020 Nov; 23(6):e12963. PubMed ID: 32160363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic conventionality and the role of epistemic reasoning in children's mutual exclusivity inferences.
    Srinivasan M; Foushee R; Bartnof A; Barner D
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():193-208. PubMed ID: 30999238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linking disambiguation and retention in a developmental eye-tracking study with monolingual and multilingual children.
    Repnik KM; Chondrogianni V; Sorace A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Jun; 206():105072. PubMed ID: 33582226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is 2-year-old children's referential disambiguation of a novel word primarily aimed at identifying the word meaning or at understanding their communicative partner?
    Marno H
    Dev Psychol; 2021 Jul; 57(7):1058-1066. PubMed ID: 34435822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year-olds exclude novel objects as potential referents of novel words based on pragmatics.
    Grassmann S; Stracke M; Tomasello M
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 19616205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twelve-month-olds disambiguate new words using mutual-exclusivity inferences.
    Pomiechowska B; Bródy G; Csibra G; Gliga T
    Cognition; 2021 Aug; 213():104691. PubMed ID: 33934847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Four-year-olds' disambiguation of action and object word reference.
    Merriman WE; Marazita J; Jarvis LH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Dec; 56(3):412-30. PubMed ID: 8301246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's use of mutual exclusivity to learn labels for parts of objects.
    Hansen MB; Markman EM
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Mar; 45(2):592-6. PubMed ID: 19271842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Young children's referent selection is guided by novelty for both words and actions.
    Dysart EL; Mather E; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():231-7. PubMed ID: 26897305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's level of word knowledge predicts their exclusion of familiar objects as referents of novel words.
    Grassmann S; Schulze C; Tomasello M
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1200. PubMed ID: 26322005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-year-olds differentially disambiguate novel words and facts.
    Scofield J; Behrend DA
    J Child Lang; 2007 Nov; 34(4):875-89. PubMed ID: 18062363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reprint of "Young children's referent selection is guided by novelty for both words and actions".
    Dysart EL; Mather E; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Nov; 151():33-9. PubMed ID: 27566944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast mapping, slow learning: disambiguation of novel word-object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30months.
    Bion RA; Borovsky A; Fernald A
    Cognition; 2013 Jan; 126(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 23063233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners.
    Markman EM; Wasow JL; Hansen MB
    Cogn Psychol; 2003 Nov; 47(3):241-75. PubMed ID: 14559217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of novelty in early word learning.
    Mather E; Plunkett K
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1157-77. PubMed ID: 22436081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilingual children weigh speaker's referential cues and word-learning heuristics differently in different language contexts when interpreting a speaker's intent.
    Hung WY; Patrycia F; Yow WQ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():796. PubMed ID: 26113836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.