124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38512203)
1. The Bayes factor, HDI-ROPE, and frequentist equivalence tests can all be reverse engineered-Almost exactly-From one another: Reply to Linde et al. (2021).
Campbell H; Gustafson P
Psychol Methods; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38512203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decisions about equivalence: A comparison of TOST, HDI-ROPE, and the Bayes factor.
Linde M; Tendeiro JN; Selker R; Wagenmakers EJ; van Ravenzwaaij D
Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):740-755. PubMed ID: 34735173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research.
Kelter R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):171. PubMed ID: 34404344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The HDI + ROPE decision rule is logically incoherent but we can fix it.
Etz A; Chávez de la Peña AF; Baroja L; Medriano K; Vandekerckhove J
Psychol Methods; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38780591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating Factorial Invariance: An Interval Estimation Approach Using Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling.
Shi D; Song H; DiStefano C; Maydeu-Olivares A; McDaniel HL; Jiang Z
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):224-245. PubMed ID: 30569738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving Inferences About Null Effects With Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests.
Lakens D; McLatchie N; Isager PM; Scheel AM; Dienes Z
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2020 Jan; 75(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 29878211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Waldian t tests: Sequential Bayesian t tests with controlled error probabilities.
Schnuerch M; Heck DW; Erdfelder E
Psychol Methods; 2024 Feb; 29(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 35420855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian lesion-deficit inference with Bayes factor mapping: Key advantages, limitations, and a toolbox.
Sperber C; Gallucci L; Smaczny S; Umarova R
Neuroimage; 2023 May; 271():120008. PubMed ID: 36914109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is a Bayes factor?
Schmalz X; Biurrun Manresa J; Zhang L
Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):705-718. PubMed ID: 34780246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporating historical information in biosimilar trials: Challenges and a hybrid Bayesian-frequentist approach.
Mielke J; Schmidli H; Jones B
Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):564-582. PubMed ID: 29532950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian Estimation of Correlation between Measures of Blood Pressure Indices, Aerobic Capacity and Resting Heart Rate Variability Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation and 95% High Density Interval in Female School Teachers.
Shalfawi SAI
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32947985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prior sensitivity of null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
Hoijtink H
Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; 27(5):804-821. PubMed ID: 34570555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing informative hypotheses in factor analysis models using bayes factors.
Gu X; Zhu X; Zhang L; Pan J
Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38095990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for
Lakens D
Soc Psychol Personal Sci; 2017 May; 8(4):355-362. PubMed ID: 28736600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite sample corrections for average equivalence testing.
Boulaguiem Y; Quartier J; Lapteva M; Kalia YN; Victoria-Feser MP; Guerrier S; Couturier DL
Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(5):833-854. PubMed ID: 38115199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Equivalence testing for linear regression.
Campbell H
Psychol Methods; 2024 Feb; 29(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 37956084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses.
Morey RD; Rouder JN
Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):406-19. PubMed ID: 21787084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data aggregation can lead to biased inferences in Bayesian linear mixed models and Bayesian analysis of variance.
Schad DJ; Nicenboim B; Vasishth S
Psychol Methods; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38271007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages masquerading as "issues" in Bayesian hypothesis testing: A commentary on Tendeiro and Kiers (2019).
van Ravenzwaaij D; Wagenmakers EJ
Psychol Methods; 2022 Jun; 27(3):451-465. PubMed ID: 34881956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
