161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38512618)
21. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Contrast-enhanced mammography in the assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment.
Hogan MP; Horvat JV; Ross DS; Sevilimedu V; Jochelson MS; Kirstein LJ; Goldfarb SB; Comstock CE; Sung JS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Apr; 198(2):349-359. PubMed ID: 36754936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI in the Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.
Bernardi D; Vatteroni G; Acquaviva A; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Bolengo I; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Trimboli RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Dec; 219(6):884-894. PubMed ID: 35731101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer.
Berg WA; Bandos AI; Sava MG
J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Aug; 20(8):758-768. PubMed ID: 37394083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. False-Positive and False-Negative Contrast-enhanced Mammograms: Pitfalls and Strategies to Improve Cancer Detection.
Carnahan MB; Harper L; Brown PJ; Bhatt AA; Eversman S; Sharpe RE; Patel BK
Radiographics; 2023 Dec; 43(12):e230100. PubMed ID: 38032823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer].
Fischer U; Diekmann F; Helbich T; Preibsch H; Püsken M; Wenkel E; Wienbeck S; Fallenberg EM
Radiologie (Heidelb); 2023 Dec; 63(12):916-924. PubMed ID: 37889284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contrast enhanced mammography: focus on frequently encountered benign and malignant diagnoses.
Yang ML; Bhimani C; Roth R; Germaine P
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 36691077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Short-term follow-up of contrast-enhanced mammography lesions after negative breast MRI in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
Coffey K; Dixon LB; Sevilimedu V; Jochelson MS; Sung JS
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111097. PubMed ID: 37738835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Current Applications and Future Directions.
Ghaderi KF; Phillips J; Perry H; Lotfi P; Mehta TS
Radiographics; 2019; 39(7):1907-1920. PubMed ID: 31697627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CEM immediately after contrast-enhanced CT: a one-step staging of breast cancer.
Ancona A; Telegrafo M; Fella RR; Iamele D; Cantore S; Moschetta M
Eur Radiol Exp; 2024 Apr; 8(1):32. PubMed ID: 38556593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for Detecting Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparison with Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
Barra FR; Sobrinho AB; Barra RR; Magalhães MT; Aguiar LR; de Albuquerque GFL; Costa RP; Farage L; Pratesi R
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8531916. PubMed ID: 30533440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a case series.
Huang PY; Tsai MY; Huang JS; Lin PY; Chou CP
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Oct; 50(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 37493921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography After Cryoablation of Breast Cancer.
Corines MJ; Sogani J; Hogan MP; Mango VL; Bryce Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Feb; 222(2):e2330250. PubMed ID: 38019473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contrast-enhanced Mammography Artifacts and Pitfalls: Tips and Tricks to Avoid Misinterpretation.
Lorente-Ramos RM; Azpeitia-Armán J; Oliva-Fonte C; Pérez-Bartolomé A; Azpeitia Hernández J
Radiographics; 2023 Oct; 43(10):e230021. PubMed ID: 37792595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Açar ÇR; Orguc S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38777678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of architectural distortion with contrast-enhanced mammography.
Goh Y; Quek ST; Pillay P; Chou CP
Clin Radiol; 2024 Mar; 79(3):163-169. PubMed ID: 38114374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interpreting contrast imaging to plan breast surgery.
Taylor DB; Hobbs MM; Ronald MM; Burrows S; Ives A; Parizel PM; Saunders CM
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Sep; 93(9):2197-2202. PubMed ID: 37438677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
