162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38512618)
41. Impact of contrast-enhanced mammography in surgical management of breast cancers for women with dense breasts: a dual-center, multi-disciplinary study in Asia.
Goh Y; Chou CP; Chan CW; Buhari SA; Hartman M; Tang SW; Ng CWQ; Pillay P; Chua W; Jagmohan P; Sterling E; Wong YM; Tan LY; Ong HY; Pan HB; Lee HS; Hung BH; Quek ST
Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8226-8237. PubMed ID: 35788756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer in Women With Breast Augmentation: Preliminary Findings.
Carnahan MB; Pockaj B; Pizzitola V; Giurescu ME; Lorans R; Eversman W; Sharpe RE; Cronin P; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):855-856. PubMed ID: 33728971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Current status and future challenges.
van Nijnatten TJA; Morscheid S; Baltzer PAT; Clauser P; Alcantara R; Kuhl CK; Wildberger JE
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 171():111312. PubMed ID: 38237520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy and precision of contrast enhanced mammography versus MRI for predicting breast cancer size: how "good" are they really?
Taylor DB; Burrows S; Dessauvagie BF; Saunders CM; Ives A
Br J Radiol; 2023 Mar; 96(1144):20211172. PubMed ID: 36753450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Analysis of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast enhanced spectral mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging.
Luczynska E; Pawlak M; Piegza T; Popiela TJ; Heinze S; Dyczek S; Rudnicki W
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(2):92-97. PubMed ID: 33448005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.
Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gelardi F; Ragaini EM; Sollini M; Bernardi D; Chiti A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36010240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study.
Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Fanizza M; Magni V; Menicagli L; Monaco CG; Benedek A; Spinelli D; Di Leo G; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7388-7399. PubMed ID: 35648209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography with MRI Utilizing an Enriched Reader Study: A Breast Cancer Study (CONTRRAST Trial).
Phillips J; Mehta TS; Portnow LH; Fishman MDC; Zhang Z; Pisano ED
Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e230530. PubMed ID: 37962503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging.
Lewin J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2018 May; 26(2):259-263. PubMed ID: 29622130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.
Jochelson MS; Lobbes MBI
Radiology; 2021 Apr; 299(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 33650905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Imaging findings for response evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ploumen RAW; de Mooij CM; Gommers S; Keymeulen KBMI; Smidt ML; van Nijnatten TJA
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5423-5435. PubMed ID: 37020070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Correlation Between Enhancement Intensity in Contrast Enhancement Spectral Mammography and Types of Kinetic Curves in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Rudnicki W; Heinze S; Piegza T; Pawlak M; Kojs Z; Łuczyńska E
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Mar; 26():e920742. PubMed ID: 32173716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Imaging Preferences in Women With a History of Breast Cancer Receiving Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Moravia LP; Mosaddhegi J; Mehta TS; Qureshi MM; Phillips J
J Breast Imaging; 2023 Nov; 5(6):685-694. PubMed ID: 38141234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Kaiyin M; Lingling T; Leilei T; Wenjia L; Bin J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Nov; 202(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 37615793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Development of Flowchart for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Lesions.
Klarić K; Šribar A; Budisavljević A; Labinac L; Valković Zujić P
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 37296810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. MRI only detected lesions: Can contrast enhanced mammography guided biopsy be an alternative method: Initial clinical findings.
Aribal E; Guldogan N; Seker ME; Yilmaz E; Turk EB
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111373. PubMed ID: 38364588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Contrast enhanced mammography in breast cancer surveillance.
Elder K; Matheson J; Nickson C; Box G; Ellis J; Mou A; Shadbolt C; Park A; Tay J; Rose A; Mann GB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jun; 199(2):221-230. PubMed ID: 36966271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Current Status of Contrast Enhanced Mammography: A Comprehensive Review.
Kornecki A
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 34492211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MRI and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MRI with mammography and ultrasound for the detection of breast cancer.
Gilbert FJ; van den Bosch HC; Petrillo A; Siegmann K; Heverhagen JT; Panizza P; Gehl HB; Pediconi F; Diekmann F; Peng WJ; Ma L; Sardanelli F; Belli P; Corcione S; Zechmann CM; Faivre-Pierret M; Martincich L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1272-86. PubMed ID: 25006633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
