162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38512618)
61. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
Covington MF
Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Performance of contrast-enhanced mammography for detecting multifocal and multicentric breast cancer and evaluating tumour size, and implications for surgical management: Early experience in a tertiary centre.
Thanh Ha Nguyen M; Varma N; Lan Cheong Wah D; Chew R; Botha T; Kouloyan-Ilic S; Paiva J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Mar; 68(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 38146085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Does pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging in addition to mammography and breast ultrasonography change the operative management of breast carcinoma?
Lim HI; Choi JH; Yang JH; Han BK; Lee JE; Lee SK; Kim WW; Kim S; Kim JS; Kim JH; Choe JH; Cho EY; Kang SS; Shin JH; Ko EY; Kim SW; Nam SJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 19760039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use.
Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJ; Meens-Koreman SD; van Stiphout RSA; Timmermans SMEC; Duvivier KM; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22224. PubMed ID: 34782698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Comparison With MRI and Mammography.
Yüzkan S; Cengiz D; Hekimsoy İ; Sezgin Okçu Ö; Oktay A
J Breast Imaging; 2021 Aug; 3(4):448-454. PubMed ID: 38424791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.
Lee J; Jung JH; Kim WW; Park CS; Lee RK; Kim HJ; Kim WH; Park HY
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):934. PubMed ID: 32993586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future.
Sogani J; Mango VL; Keating D; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
Clin Imaging; 2021 Jan; 69():269-279. PubMed ID: 33032103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Impact of low dose superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer for sentinel node biopsy in breast conserving treatment on susceptibility artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging and contrast enhanced mammography.
van Haaren ERM; Spiekerman van Weezelenburg MA; van Bastelaar J; Janssen A; van Nijnatten T; Bouwman LH; Vissers YLJ; Lobbes MBI
Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 53():102045. PubMed ID: 38330805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Preoperative Staging and Work-Up of Patients Affected by Invasive Lobular Carcinoma or Invasive Ductolobular Carcinoma.
Selvi V; Nori J; Meattini I; Francolini G; Morelli N; De Benedetto D; Bicchierai G; Di Naro F; Gill MK; Orzalesi L; Sanchez L; Susini T; Bianchi S; Livi L; Miele V
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1569060. PubMed ID: 30046588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Evaluation of single-view contrast-enhanced mammography as novel reading strategy: a non-inferiority feasibility study.
Lobbes MBI; Hecker J; Houben IPL; Pluymakers R; Jeukens C; Laji UC; Gommers S; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ
Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6211-6219. PubMed ID: 31073859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Grueneisen J; Nagarajah J; Buchbender C; Hoffmann O; Schaarschmidt BM; Poeppel T; Forsting M; Quick HH; Umutlu L; Kinner S
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):505-13. PubMed ID: 26115367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes.
Alcantara R; Posso M; Pitarch M; Arenas N; Ejarque B; Iotti V; Besutti G
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):417-428. PubMed ID: 35895121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Association of Clinical Factors and Degree of Early Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Wang S; Sun Y; You C; Jiang T; Yang M; Shen X; Qian M; Duan S; Lynn HS; Li R; Gu Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 36695647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.
Li L; Roth R; Germaine P; Ren S; Lee M; Hunter K; Tinney E; Liao L
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Feb; 98(2):113-123. PubMed ID: 27687829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
Schelfout K; Van Goethem M; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Schelfhout AM; Leyman P; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Den Haute J; Gillardin JP; Tjalma W; Van Der Auwera JC; Buytaert P; De Schepper A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Incidental enhancing lesions found on preoperative breast MRI: management and role of second-look ultrasound.
Luciani ML; Pediconi F; Telesca M; Vasselli F; Casali V; Miglio E; Passariello R; Catalano C
Radiol Med; 2011 Sep; 116(6):886-904. PubMed ID: 21293943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
