123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38512888)
1. Risk classification system using the detailed positive surgical margin status for predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hatayama T; Goto K; Fujiyama K; Goriki A; Kaneko M; Mita K
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38512888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Morizane S; Yumioka T; Makishima K; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Honda M; Umekita Y; Takenaka A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Oct; 26(10):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 34313905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical effect of a positive surgical margin without extraprostatic extension after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Horiguchi Y; Inoue R; Yoshio O; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
Urol Oncol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):503.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26277617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kano H; Kadono Y; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Ikeda H; Mizokami A
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):509-516. PubMed ID: 33419850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.
Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Zargar H; Autorino R; Lee SE
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Oct; 69(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 28376606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yang CW; Wang HH; Hassouna MF; Chand M; Huang WJS; Chung HJ
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14329. PubMed ID: 34253832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical factors associated with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan (the MSUG94 group).
Kawase M; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Sasaki T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Inoue T; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koga F; Urakami S; Koie T
J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 36928750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Gleason Grade 3 as a Predictive Factor for Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group).
Kawase M; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Sasaki T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Inoue T; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koga F; Urakami S; Koie T
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jul; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 35893105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer.
Lee W; Lim B; Kyung YS; Kim CS
Prostate Int; 2021 Sep; 9(3):151-156. PubMed ID: 34692588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
