These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38513224)

  • 1. Hot isostatic pressing as an alternative thermo-mechanical treatment for metallic full-arch implant-supported frameworks obtained by additive and subtractive manufacturing technology: Vertical and horizontal fit, screw removal torque, and stress analysis.
    Barbin T; Borges GA; Jardini AL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38513224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D metal printing in dentistry: An in vitro biomechanical comparative study of two additive manufacturing technologies for full-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Barbin T; Velôso DV; Del Rio Silva L; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Mesquita MF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Aug; 108():103821. PubMed ID: 32469723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Frameworks Supported by the All-on-Six Implant Concept: Dimensional Precision After Veneer Layering and Spark Erosion.
    Velôso DV; Barbin T; Del Rio Silva L; Borges GA; Camacho Presotto AG; Mesquita MF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):700-708. PubMed ID: 35904826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and comparison of vertical marginal fit of three different types of multiunit screw-retained framework fabricated for an implant-supported prosthesis - An
    Singh M; Yadav BK; Phukela SS; Ritwal P; Nagpal A; Saluja P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 36511053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can ceramic veneer spark erosion and mechanical cycling affect the accuracy of milled complete-arch frameworks supported by 6 implants?
    Del Rio Silva L; Velôso DV; Barbin T; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):772-778. PubMed ID: 33087248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical behavior of CAD/CAM cobalt-chromium and zirconia full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Barbin T; Silva LDR; Velôso DV; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Groppo FC; Ferraz Mesquita M
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 12(6):329-337. PubMed ID: 33489016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of the passivity of the fit of multiunit screw-retained implant frameworks manufactured by using additive and subtractive technologies.
    Abu Ghofa A; Önöral Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 34294420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancy of complete-arch titanium frameworks manufactured using selective laser melting and electron beam melting additive manufacturing technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Ceballos L; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 30006219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit and Stability of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Frameworks Under Masticatory Simulation: Influence of Cylinder Type.
    Bhering CL; Marques Ida S; Takahashi JM; Barão VA; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Aug; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 26465960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro study using confocal laser scanning microscopy to evaluate the marginal misfits of different implant-supported frameworks.
    Tonin BSH; Fu J; Peixoto RF; Fischer NG; Fernandes RM; Curylofo PA; de Mattos MDGC; Macedo AP; de Almeida RP
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38305664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant-Abutment Discrepancy Before and After Acrylic Resin Veneering of Complete-Arch Titanium Frameworks Manufactured Using Milling and Electron Beam Melting Technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Pérez-López J; Barmak AB; Raigrodski AJ; Rubenstein J; Galluci GO
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):88-96. PubMed ID: 35313021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering.
    Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
    Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of framework fabrication technique on the fit accuracy of full arch screw retained implant supported prostheses.
    AlRasheed F; AlWazzan K
    Saudi Dent J; 2022 May; 34(4):288-297. PubMed ID: 35692240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
    Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 2: Screw resistance test.
    Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Mischitz I; Larsson C; Janda M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):262-271. PubMed ID: 35981927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Passive Fit Analysis of Laser-Sintered, Three-Unit Implant Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.
    Del Monte S; Shahdad S; Taylor P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Nov; 36(5):650. PubMed ID: 33662050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.