These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38513287)

  • 1. Variability of pulse width in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Osnabruegge M; Kanig C; Schoisswohl S; Litschel K; Mack W; Schecklmann M; Langguth B; Schwitzgebel F
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Apr; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 38513287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulse Width Affects Scalp Sensation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Peterchev AV; Luber B; Westin GG; Lisanby SH
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 28029593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuronal tuning: Selective targeting of neuronal populations via manipulation of pulse width and directionality.
    Halawa I; Shirota Y; Neef A; Sommer M; Paulus W
    Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(5):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 31085123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters (cTMS).
    Peterchev AV; Murphy DL; Lisanby SH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2922-6. PubMed ID: 21095986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corticomotor responses to triple-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: Effects of interstimulus interval and stimulus intensity.
    Sacco P; Turner D; Rothwell J; Thickbroom G
    Brain Stimul; 2009 Jan; 2(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20633401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of coil orientation on strength-duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    D'Ostilio K; Goetz SM; Hannah R; Ciocca M; Chieffo R; Chen JA; Peterchev AV; Rothwell JC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):675-683. PubMed ID: 26077634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultra-high frequency repetitive TMS at subthreshold intensity induces suprathreshold motor response via temporal summation.
    Nguyen H; Li CQ; Hoffman S; Deng ZD; Yang Y; Lu H
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Aug; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 39079555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TMS-related potentials and artifacts in combined TMS-EEG measurements: Comparison of three different TMS devices.
    Van Doren J; Langguth B; Schecklmann M
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2015 May; 45(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 25892330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modular multilevel TMS device with wide output range and ultrabrief pulse capability for sound reduction.
    Zeng Z; Koponen LM; Hamdan R; Li Z; Goetz SM; Peterchev AV
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Mar; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35189604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient Mapping of the Motor Cortex with Navigated Biphasic Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Pitkänen M; Kallioniemi E; Järnefelt G; Karhu J; Julkunen P
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Nov; 31(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 29971634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strength-Duration Relationship in Paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Its Implications for Repetitive TMS.
    Shirota Y; Sommer M; Paulus W
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(5):755-761. PubMed ID: 27234142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for the assessment of knee extensor muscle function.
    Temesi J; Ly SN; Millet GY
    J Neurol Sci; 2017 Apr; 375():442-449. PubMed ID: 28320184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulse Duration as Well as Current Direction Determines the Specificity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex during Contraction.
    Hannah R; Rothwell JC
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(1):106-115. PubMed ID: 28029595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent.
    Raco V; Bauer R; Norim S; Gharabaghi A
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1055-1060. PubMed ID: 28779945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TMS of primary motor cortex with a biphasic pulse activates two independent sets of excitable neurones.
    Sommer M; Ciocca M; Chieffo R; Hammond P; Neef A; Paulus W; Rothwell JC; Hannah R
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 29352669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: Monophasic vs biphasic TMS.
    Wendt K; Sorkhabi MM; Stagg CJ; Fleming MK; Denison T; O'Shea J
    Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(4):1178-1185. PubMed ID: 37543172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cortical silent period: intrinsic variability and relation to the waveform of the transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse.
    Orth M; Rothwell JC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 May; 115(5):1076-82. PubMed ID: 15066533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Biabani M; Fornito A; Coxon JP; Fulcher BD; Rogasch NC
    J Physiol; 2021 Jun; 599(11):2907-2932. PubMed ID: 33599980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation test intensity on the amplitude, variability and reliability of motor evoked potentials.
    Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 1700():190-198. PubMed ID: 30194017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS.
    Rothkegel H; Sommer M; Paulus W; Lang N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1915-21. PubMed ID: 20444645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.