BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38515416)

  • 1. [Development and in vivo biomechanics of goat mobile artificial lumbar spine complex].
    Zhang F; He XJ; Liu JT; Wang R; Qin J; Zang QJ; Zhang T; Liu ZY
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2024 Mar; 37(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 38515416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel 3D-Printed Movable Lumbar Vertebral Complex for Replacement: In Vivo and Biomechanical Evaluation of Goat Model.
    Zhang F; Liu J; He X; Wang R; Lu T; Zhang T; Liu Z
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():2343404. PubMed ID: 34926682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lumbar subtotal corpectomy non-fusion model produced using a novel prosthesis.
    Liu J; Zhang F; Gao Z; Li Y; Niu B; He X
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Nov; 137(11):1467-1476. PubMed ID: 28889244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and preliminary biomechanical analysis of a novel motion preservation device for lumbar spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy.
    Liu J; He X; Gao Z; Niu B; Lv D; Gao Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 Jun; 139(6):751-760. PubMed ID: 30747259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical changes of degenerated adjacent segment and intact lumbar spine after lumbosacral topping-off surgery: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Cao L; Liu Y; Mei W; Xu J; Zhan S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):104. PubMed ID: 32061252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Eestablishment of the model of goat lumbar spinal fusion by 3D printing technology and experimental perioperative management].
    Zhang F; Liu JT; Wang R; Lu T; Niu BB; Qie J; Cai X; Zhang T; Ouyang PR; He XJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2018 May; 31(5):458-464. PubMed ID: 29890807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oblique lateral interbody fusion with internal fixations in the treatment for cross-segment degenerative lumbar spine disease (L2-3 and L4-5) finite element analysis.
    Zhang S; Zhang Y; Huang L; Zhang S; Lu C; Liu Z; Kang C; Wang Z
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17116. PubMed ID: 37816744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative finite element analysis of artificial intervertebral disc replacement and pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine.
    Biswas JK; Malas A; Majumdar S; Rana M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Dec; 25(16):1812-1820. PubMed ID: 35152795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vivo comparison study in goats for a novel motion-preserving cervical joint system.
    Qin J; Zhao C; Wang D; Zhao B; Dong J; Li H; Sang R; Wang S; Fu J; Kong R; He X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178775. PubMed ID: 28582418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical effects of interbody cage height on adjacent segments in patients with lumbar degeneration: a 3D finite element study.
    Lu X; Li D; Wang H; Xia X; Ma X; Lv F; Zou F; Jiang J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 17(1):325. PubMed ID: 35729647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
    Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
    Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt R; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Reichel H; Cakir B
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S577-84. PubMed ID: 20830492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
    Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.