151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38515675)
21. Selection of 1-mm venting or 2.5-mm screw access holes on implant crowns based on cement extrusion and retention capacity.
Zhou H; Ye S; Liu M; Feng H; Wen C
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):108. PubMed ID: 35366875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Resistance to Fracture in Fixed Dental Prostheses Over Cemented and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Zirconia Cantilevers in the Anterior Region: An In Vitro Study.
Rues S; Kappel S; Ruckes D; Rammelsberg P; Zenthöfer A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 32406648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative analysis of stress distribution around CFR‑PEEK implants and titanium implants with different prosthetic crowns: A finite element analysis.
Tamrakar SK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Rao S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):359-367. PubMed ID: 34597479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of Restoration Design on the Removal Torque Loss of Implant-supported Crowns after Cyclic Loading.
Jongsiri S; Arksornnukit M; Homsiang W; Kamonkhantikul K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Dec; 24(12):951-956. PubMed ID: 38317392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].
Liang F; Wu MJ; Zou LD
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):970-976. PubMed ID: 34650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of cortical zone level and prosthetic platform angle in dental implant mechanical response: A 3D finite element analysis.
Ausiello P; Tribst JPM; Ventre M; Salvati E; di Lauro AE; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2021 Nov; 37(11):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 34497022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns.
Al-Omari WM; Shadid R; Abu-Naba'a L; El Masoud B
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):263-73. PubMed ID: 20136704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of different implant angulations on the biomechanical performance of prosthetic screws in two implant-supported, screw-retained prostheses: A numerical and experimental study.
Chen J; Guo J; Yang L; Wang L; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):240.e1-240.e10. PubMed ID: 37419710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of Different Customized Abutment Types on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Single Crown: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Pumnil S; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Elsaka S
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):e2-e11. PubMed ID: 35505638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Current Perspective on Screw-Retained Single-Implant Restorations: A Review of Pertinent Literature.
Priest G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 May; 29(3):161-171. PubMed ID: 28112854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of screw access channel on the fracture rate of lithium disilicate cement-retained implant-supported posterior crowns.
Khamis MM; Zakaria NH
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):618-625. PubMed ID: 33309213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Investigation of the Type of Angled Abutment for Anterior Maxillary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Korkmaz IH; Kul E
J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 34859942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of bone mass density and alveolar bone resorption on stress in implant restoration of free-end edentulous posterior mandible: Finite element analysis of double-factor sensitivity.
Ye Z; Ye H; Wu Y; Jiang Z; Yao H; Xu X; Zhang Y; Du W; Li W; Zheng Y; Ye P; Ding X; Wu L
Ann Anat; 2024 Apr; 253():152210. PubMed ID: 38244942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
