These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38516933)

  • 1. AI vs academia: Experimental study on AI text detectors' accuracy in behavioral health academic writing.
    Popkov AA; Barrett TS
    Account Res; 2024 Mar; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 38516933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.
    Pan ET; Florian-Rodriguez M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38710267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Between human and AI: assessing the reliability of AI text detection tools.
    Bellini V; Semeraro F; Montomoli J; Cascella M; Bignami E
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2024 Mar; 40(3):353-358. PubMed ID: 38265047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting generative artificial intelligence in scientific articles: Evasion techniques and implications for scientific integrity.
    Odri GA; Ji Yun Yoon D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 109(8):103706. PubMed ID: 37838021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022.
    Bisi T; Risser A; Clavert P; Migaud H; Dartus J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 109(8):103694. PubMed ID: 37776949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of Artificial Intelligence Content Detectors Using Human and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Scientific Writing.
    Flitcroft MA; Sheriff SA; Wolfrath N; Maddula R; McConnell L; Xing Y; Haines KL; Wong SL; Kothari AN
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38909113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions and detection of AI use in manuscript preparation for academic journals.
    Chemaya N; Martin D
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0304807. PubMed ID: 38995880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing.
    Semrl N; Feigl S; Taumberger N; Bracic T; Fluhr H; Blockeel C; Kollmann M
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 37833847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How much can we rely on artificial intelligence chatbots such as the ChatGPT software program to assist with scientific writing?
    Dashti M; Londono J; Ghasemi S; Moghaddasi N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37438164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AI-generated text in otolaryngology publications: a comparative analysis before and after the release of ChatGPT.
    Carnino JM; Chong NYK; Bayly H; Salvati LR; Tiwana HS; Levi JR
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39014250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.
    Dergaa I; Chamari K; Zmijewski P; Ben Saad H
    Biol Sport; 2023 Apr; 40(2):615-622. PubMed ID: 37077800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GPTZero Performance in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Texts: A Preliminary Study.
    Habibzadeh F
    J Korean Med Sci; 2023 Sep; 38(38):e319. PubMed ID: 37750374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fake academic writing: ethics during chatbot era.
    Caprioglio A; Paglia L
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2023 Jun; 24(2):88-89. PubMed ID: 37337701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation.
    Khlaif ZN; Mousa A; Hattab MK; Itmazi J; Hassan AA; Sanmugam M; Ayyoub A
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e47049. PubMed ID: 37707884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing.
    Inam M; Sheikh S; Minhas AMK; Vaughan EM; Krittanawong C; Samad Z; Lavie CJ; Khoja A; D'Cruze M; Slipczuk L; Alarakhiya F; Naseem A; Haider AH; Virani SS
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Mar; 49(3):102387. PubMed ID: 38185435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis.
    Hakam HT; Prill R; Korte L; Lovreković B; Ostojić M; Ramadanov N; Muehlensiepen F
    JMIR Form Res; 2024 Feb; 8():e52164. PubMed ID: 38363631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.
    Guleria A; Krishan K; Sharma V; Kanchan T
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2023 Sep; 17(9):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 37824352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinguishing academic science writing from humans or ChatGPT with over 99% accuracy using off-the-shelf machine learning tools.
    Desaire H; Chua AE; Isom M; Jarosova R; Hua D
    Cell Rep Phys Sci; 2023 Jun; 4(6):. PubMed ID: 37426542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Cheng SL; Tsai SJ; Bai YM; Ko CH; Hsu CW; Yang FC; Tsai CK; Tu YK; Yang SN; Tseng PT; Hsu TW; Liang CS; Su KP
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51229. PubMed ID: 38145486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying ChatGPT-written Patient Education Materials Using Text Analysis and Readability.
    Monje S; Ulene S; Gimovsky AC
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38593984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.