These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38517301)

  • 41. Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.
    Peng S; Huang J; Liu X; Deng J; Sun C; Tang J; Chen H; Cao W; Wang W; Duan X; Luo X; Peng S
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():994359. PubMed ID: 36312291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bridging the gap: understanding Belgian anesthesiologists' proficiency and training demands in gastric point-of-care ultrasound, a case-based survey.
    Maseri A; Delhez Q; Dincq AS; Lacrosse D
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):383. PubMed ID: 38589900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Predictive modeling of blood pressure during hemodialysis: a comparison of linear model, random forest, support vector regression, XGBoost, LASSO regression and ensemble method.
    Huang JC; Tsai YC; Wu PY; Lien YH; Chien CY; Kuo CF; Hung JF; Chen SC; Kuo CH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105536. PubMed ID: 32485511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Predicting sepsis in-hospital mortality with machine learning: a multi-center study using clinical and inflammatory biomarkers.
    Zhang G; Shao F; Yuan W; Wu J; Qi X; Gao J; Shao R; Tang Z; Wang T
    Eur J Med Res; 2024 Mar; 29(1):156. PubMed ID: 38448999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prediction model of obstructive sleep apnea-related hypertension: Machine learning-based development and interpretation study.
    Shi Y; Ma L; Chen X; Li W; Feng Y; Zhang Y; Cao Z; Yuan Y; Xie Y; Liu H; Yin L; Zhao C; Wu S; Ren X
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():1042996. PubMed ID: 36545020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Gastric ultrasound as a preoperative bedside test for residual gastric contents volume in children.
    Schmitz A; Schmidt AR; Buehler PK; Schraner T; Frühauf M; Weiss M; Klaghofer R; Kellenberger CJ
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Dec; 26(12):1157-1164. PubMed ID: 27543559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Extreme learning machines: a new approach for modeling dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration with and without water quality variables as predictors.
    Heddam S; Kisi O
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jul; 24(20):16702-16724. PubMed ID: 28560629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of a machine learning algorithms for predicting the dental age of adolescent based on different preprocessing methods.
    Shen S; Yuan X; Wang J; Fan L; Zhao J; Tao J
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1068253. PubMed ID: 36530730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. "Full Stomach" Despite the Wait: Point-of-care Gastric Ultrasound at the Time of Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
    Leviter J; Steele DW; Constantine E; Linakis JG; Amanullah S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2019 Jul; 26(7):752-760. PubMed ID: 30372569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Gastric sonography in the fasted surgical patient: a prospective descriptive study.
    Perlas A; Davis L; Khan M; Mitsakakis N; Chan VW
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Jul; 113(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 21596885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Machine learning guided postnatal gestational age assessment using new-born screening metabolomic data in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
    Sazawal S; Ryckman KK; Das S; Khanam R; Nisar I; Jasper E; Dutta A; Rahman S; Mehmood U; Bedell B; Deb S; Chowdhury NH; Barkat A; Mittal H; Ahmed S; Khalid F; Raqib R; Manu A; Yoshida S; Ilyas M; Nizar A; Ali SM; Baqui AH; Jehan F; Dhingra U; Bahl R
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Sep; 21(1):609. PubMed ID: 34493237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Application of machine learning techniques for predicting survival in ovarian cancer.
    Sorayaie Azar A; Babaei Rikan S; Naemi A; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi J; Pirnejad H; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi M; Wiil UK
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Dec; 22(1):345. PubMed ID: 36585641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predicting the Ability of Wounds to Heal Given Any Burn Size and Fluid Volume: An Analytical Approach.
    Liu NT; Rizzo JA; Shields BA; Serio-Melvin ML; Christy RJ; Salinas J
    J Burn Care Res; 2018 Aug; 39(5):661-669. PubMed ID: 29757400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance of a machine learning-based decision model to help clinicians decide the extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in gastric cancer before surgical resection.
    Liu C; Qi L; Feng QX; Sun SW; Zhang YD; Liu XS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Sep; 44(9):3019-3029. PubMed ID: 31201432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Disability risk prediction model based on machine learning among Chinese healthy older adults: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
    Han Y; Wang S
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1271595. PubMed ID: 38026309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning.
    Tseng PY; Chen YT; Wang CH; Chiu KM; Peng YS; Hsu SP; Chen KL; Yang CY; Lee OK
    Crit Care; 2020 Jul; 24(1):478. PubMed ID: 32736589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An evaluation of cervical maturity for Chinese women with labor induction by machine learning and ultrasound images.
    Liu YS; Lu S; Wang HB; Hou Z; Zhang CY; Chong YW; Wang S; Tang WZ; Qu XL; Zhang Y
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Oct; 23(1):737. PubMed ID: 37853378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prediction of soil salinity in the Upputeru river estuary catchment, India, using machine learning techniques.
    Mantena S; Mahammood V; Rao KN
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jul; 195(8):1006. PubMed ID: 37500987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparative study of 11 non-linear regression models highlighting autoencoder, DBN, and SVR, enhanced by SHAP importance analysis in soybean branching prediction.
    Zhou W; Yan Z; Zhang L
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5905. PubMed ID: 38467662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Predicting Readmission Charges Billed by Hospitals: Machine Learning Approach.
    Gopukumar D; Ghoshal A; Zhao H
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Aug; 10(8):e37578. PubMed ID: 35896038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.