BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38517543)

  • 1. A personal perspective on controversies in the surgical management of oesophageal cancer.
    McK Manson J; Beasley WD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2014 Nov; 96(8):575-8. PubMed ID: 25350177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of robot-assisted Ivor Lewis procedure: Robotic hand-sewn, linear or circular technique?
    Plat VD; Stam WT; Schoonmade LJ; Heineman DJ; van der Peet DL; Daams F
    Am J Surg; 2020 Jul; 220(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 31796219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a review of the technique.
    Chouliaras K; Hochwald S; Kukar M
    Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):831-838. PubMed ID: 34014498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fashioning esophagogastric anastomosis in robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: a multicenter experience.
    Milone M; Bianchi PP; Cianchi F; Coratti A; D'Amore A; De Manzoni G; De Pasqual CA; Formisano G; Jovine E; Morelli L; Offi M; Peri A; Pietrabissa A; Staderini F; Tribuzi A; Giacopuzzi S
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Mar; 409(1):103. PubMed ID: 38517543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis of Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer.
    Zhang H; Wang Z; Zheng Y; Geng Y; Wang F; Chen LQ; Wang Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Dec; 43(12):3074-3082. PubMed ID: 31538252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
    Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully Robotic Side-to-Side Linear-Stapled Anastomosis During Robotic Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
    Guerra F; Tribuzi A; Giuliani G; Di Marino M; Coratti A
    World J Surg; 2023 Sep; 47(9):2207-2212. PubMed ID: 37210424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
    Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
    Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (RAILE): A review of surgical techniques and clinical outcomes.
    Shen T; Zhang Y; Cao Y; Li C; Li H
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():998282. PubMed ID: 36406371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Esophagectomy. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
    Manigrasso M; Vertaldi S; Marello A; Antoniou SA; Francis NK; De Palma GD; Milone M
    J Pers Med; 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34357107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
    Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the MIRO Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nuytens F; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Gagnière J; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrère N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Markar SR; Piessen G;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Apr; 156(4):323-332. PubMed ID: 33595631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
    Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.