BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38517612)

  • 1. Wearable mobile health device for monitoring postoperative ambulation among patients with colorectal cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery: A prospective comparison study.
    Liao YT; Chou YJ; Wu CT; Liu YH; Liang JT; Lai F; Shun SC
    Int J Med Robot; 2024 Apr; 20(2):e2626. PubMed ID: 38517612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wearable-Based Mobile Health App in Gastric Cancer Patients for Postoperative Physical Activity Monitoring: Focus Group Study.
    Wu JM; Ho TW; Chang YT; Hsu C; Tsai CJ; Lai F; Lin MT
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e11989. PubMed ID: 31012858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced recovery pathway in open and minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective study on feasibility, compliance, and outcomes in a high-volume resource limited tertiary cancer center.
    Thomas M; Agarwal V; DeSouza A; Joshi R; Mali M; Panhale K; Salvi OK; Ambulkar R; Shrikhande S; Saklani A
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Feb; 408(1):99. PubMed ID: 36811742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring postoperative ambulation and sleep after head and neck surgery: Feasibility and utility study using wearable devices.
    Pandrangi VC; Jorizzo M; Shah S; Bruening J; Wax MK; Clayburgh D; Andersen P; Li RJ
    Head Neck; 2022 Dec; 44(12):2744-2752. PubMed ID: 36052957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wearable Technology in the Perioperative Period: Predicting Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery.
    Hedrick TL; Hassinger TE; Myers E; Krebs ED; Chu D; Charles AN; Hoang SC; Friel CM; Thiele RH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Apr; 63(4):538-544. PubMed ID: 32015289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accelerated enhanced
    Price BA; Bednarski BK; You YN; Manandhar M; Dean EM; Alawadi ZM; Bryce Speer B; Gottumukkala V; Weldon M; Massey RL; Wang X; Qiao W; Chang GJ
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e015960. PubMed ID: 28729319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of surgeon specialty and volume on the utilization of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes for colorectal cancer: a retrospective review.
    Osagiede O; Haehn DA; Spaulding AC; Otto N; Cochuyt JJ; Lemini R; Merchea A; Kelley S; Colibaseanu DT
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Oct; 35(10):5480-5488. PubMed ID: 32989545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Li N; Liu Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Feb; 33(2):177-187. PubMed ID: 36074099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative Urinary Retention After Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection with Early Catheter Removal: A Prospective Observational Study.
    Eriksen JR; Munk-Madsen P; Kehlet H; Gögenur I
    World J Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(8):2090-2098. PubMed ID: 30993391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis.
    Imaizumi K; Homma S; Miyaoka Y; Matsui H; Ichikawa N; Yoshida T; Takahashi N; Taketomi A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Aug; 101(32):e29869. PubMed ID: 35960060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial.
    Metcalfe C; Avery K; Berrisford R; Barham P; Noble SM; Fernandez AM; Hanna G; Goldin R; Elliott J; Wheatley T; Sanders G; Hollowood A; Falk S; Titcomb D; Streets C; Donovan JL; Blazeby JM
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Jun; 20(48):1-68. PubMed ID: 27373720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation on 30-Day Postoperative Complications for Frail Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Carli F; Bousquet-Dion G; Awasthi R; Elsherbini N; Liberman S; Boutros M; Stein B; Charlebois P; Ghitulescu G; Morin N; Jagoe T; Scheede-Bergdahl C; Minnella EM; Fiore JF
    JAMA Surg; 2020 Mar; 155(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 31968063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Consumer Wearable Devices to Profile Postoperative Complications After Pediatric Appendectomy.
    Pitt JB; Zeineddin S; Carter M; Figueroa A; Park E; Kwon S; Ghomrawi H; Abdullah F
    J Surg Res; 2024 Mar; 295():853-861. PubMed ID: 38052697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of a tailored ERAS programme in octogenarian patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer.
    Depalma N; Cassini D; Grieco M; Barbieri V; Altamura A; Manoochehri F; Viola M; Baldazzi G
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2020 Feb; 32(2):265-273. PubMed ID: 30982218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of Wearable Sensors to Assess Postoperative Recovery in Pediatric Patients After Appendectomy.
    De Boer C; Ghomrawi H; Many B; Bouchard ME; Linton S; Figueroa A; Kwon S; Abdullah F
    J Surg Res; 2021 Jul; 263():160-166. PubMed ID: 33667871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Wearable Biosensors to Predict Length of Stay for Patients with IBD After Bowel Surgery.
    Yi Y; Sossenheimer PH; Erondu AI; Skowron KB; Rai V; Singer JM; El Jurdi K; Hyman NH; Rubin DT
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(3):844-853. PubMed ID: 33761092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial of accelerated enhanced recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI trial).
    Bednarski BK; Nickerson TP; You YN; Messick CA; Speer B; Gottumukkala V; Manandhar M; Weldon M; Dean EM; Qiao W; Wang X; Chang GJ
    Br J Surg; 2019 Sep; 106(10):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 31216065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insurance status does not affect short-term outcomes after oncological colorectal surgery in Europe, but influences the use of minimally invasive techniques: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Schneider MA; Rickenbacher A; Frick L; Cabalzar-Wondberg D; Käser S; Clavien PA; Turina M
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Nov; 403(7):863-872. PubMed ID: 30361827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Financial incentives and wearable activity monitors to increase ambulation after cystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
    Strother M; Koepsell K; Song L; Faerber J; Bernard J; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo T; Tasian G
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):434.e31-434.e38. PubMed ID: 33308975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.