156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38518282)
1. Exploring tribology and material contact science in spine surgery: implications for implant design.
Scariano G; Meade S; Sultan A; Shost M; Benzel EC; Krishnaney A; Mroz T; Steinmetz MP; Habboub G
J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Jun; 40(6):801-810. PubMed ID: 38518282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants.
Gittens RA; Olivares-Navarrete R; Schwartz Z; Boyan BD
Acta Biomater; 2014 Aug; 10(8):3363-71. PubMed ID: 24721613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spinal implant debris-induced osteolysis.
Hallab NJ; Cunningham BW; Jacobs JJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S125-38. PubMed ID: 14560184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Use of Various Types of Interbody Implants in Cervical Spine Surgery. Critical Review of the Literature.
Godlewski B; Dominiak M
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 22(4):213-220. PubMed ID: 32986004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface Modification Techniques to Enhance Osseointegration of Spinal Implants.
Possley D; Baker E; Baker K; Khalil JG
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Nov; 28(22):e988-e994. PubMed ID: 32868701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research progress on the biological modifications of implant materials in 3D printed intervertebral fusion cages.
Li S; Huan Y; Zhu B; Chen H; Tang M; Yan Y; Wang C; Ouyang Z; Li X; Xue J; Wang W
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2021 Dec; 33(1):2. PubMed ID: 34940930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum 5-Year Follow-up on Graduates of Growing Spine Surgery for Early Onset Scoliosis.
Murphy RF; Barfield WR; Emans JB; Akbarnia B; Thompson G; Sponseller P; Skaggs D; Marks D; Smith JT; Flynn J; Presson A; Sawyer JR; Johnston C;
J Pediatr Orthop; 2020; 40(10):e942-e946. PubMed ID: 32773654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical biomechanical considerations for spine implant testing.
Margulies JY; Thampi SP; Bitan FD; Cora DC
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1999; 64(3):347-64. PubMed ID: 10495560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Axially dynamic implants for stabilization of the cervical spine.
Steinmetz MP; Benzel EC; Apfelbaum RI
Neurosurgery; 2006 Oct; 59(4 Suppl 2):ONS378-88; discussion ONS388-9. PubMed ID: 17041507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision surgery of spinal dynamic implants: a literature review and algorithm proposal.
Cecchinato R; Bourghli A; Obeid I
Eur Spine J; 2020 Feb; 29(Suppl 1):57-65. PubMed ID: 31916002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Material failure in dynamic spine implants: are the standardized implant tests before market launch sufficient?
Oikonomidis S; Sobottke R; Wilke HJ; Herren C; Beckmann A; Zarghooni K; Siewe J
Eur Spine J; 2019 Apr; 28(4):872-882. PubMed ID: 30649613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative studies of cervical spine anterior stabilization systems--Finite element analysis.
Mackiewicz A; Banach M; Denisiewicz A; Bedzinski R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():72-9. PubMed ID: 26851563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of bioabsorbable implants in the spine.
Vaccaro AR; Singh K; Haid R; Kitchel S; Wuisman P; Taylor W; Branch C; Garfin S
Spine J; 2003; 3(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 14589204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Basic science of spinal instrumentation.
Goel VK; Gilbertson LG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Feb; (335):10-31. PubMed ID: 9020203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system.
Kaner T; Sasani M; Oktenoglu T; Ozer AF
Turk Neurosurg; 2010 Apr; 20(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 20401848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modern spinal instrumentation. Part 1: normal spinal implants.
Davis W; Allouni AK; Mankad K; Prezzi D; Elias T; Rankine J; Davagnanam I
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 22658915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative bearing surface options for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Patel D; Parvizi J; Sharkey PF
Instr Course Lect; 2011; 60():257-67. PubMed ID: 21553778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration.
Rao PJ; Pelletier MH; Walsh WR; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2014 May; 6(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 24890288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porous tricalcium phosphate and transforming growth factor used for anterior spine surgery.
Steffen T; Stoll T; Arvinte T; Schenk RK
Eur Spine J; 2001 Oct; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S132-40. PubMed ID: 11716010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
