These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38520153)
1. Dissecting human anatomy learning process through anatomical education with augmented reality: AEducAR 2.0, an updated interdisciplinary study. Neri I; Cercenelli L; Marcuccio M; Lodi S; Koufi FD; Fazio A; Marvi MV; Marcelli E; Billi AM; Ruggeri A; Tarsitano A; Manzoli L; Badiali G; Ratti S Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):693-711. PubMed ID: 38520153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancement of Anatomical Education Using Augmented Reality: An Empirical Study of Body Painting. Barmaki R; Yu K; Pearlman R; Shingles R; Bork F; Osgood GM; Navab N Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 30648818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy. Bork F; Stratmann L; Enssle S; Eck U; Navab N; Waschke J; Kugelmann D Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):585-598. PubMed ID: 30697948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cercenelli L; De Stefano A; Billi AM; Ruggeri A; Marcelli E; Marchetti C; Manzoli L; Ratti S; Badiali G Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of blended learning in radiological anatomy for first year undergraduate medical students. Nagaraj C; Yadurappa SB; Anantharaman LT; Ravindranath Y; Shankar N Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Apr; 43(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 32964270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of augmented reality models of canine skull in veterinary anatomical education. Jiang N; Jiang Z; Huang Y; Sun M; Sun X; Huan Y; Li F Anat Sci Educ; 2024; 17(3):546-557. PubMed ID: 38238283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reimagining human dissection in preclinical medical education using studio-based learning: A retrospective pilot study. Leung Y; Ho KL; Yung L; Tang MKF Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Sep; 17(6):1198-1214. PubMed ID: 38415402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the Dimensions of Medical Student Engagement with Technology-Enhanced Learning Resources and Assessing the Impact on Assessment Outcomes. Pickering JD; Swinnerton BJ Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):117-128. PubMed ID: 30168911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactive Lecture in the Dissection Hall: Transforming Passive Lecture into a Dynamic Learning Experience. Chimmalgi M Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30118568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Moro C; Štromberga Z; Raikos A; Stirling A Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):549-559. PubMed ID: 28419750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Three-Dimensional Printed Anatomical Models on First-Year Student Engagement in a Block Mode Delivery. Tripodi N; Kelly K; Husaric M; Wospil R; Fleischmann M; Johnston S; Harkin K Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Nov; 13(6):769-777. PubMed ID: 32163665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Haptics and Drawing Enhance the Learning of Anatomy. Reid S; Shapiro L; Louw G Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 30107081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study. Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroanatomy Learning: Augmented Reality vs. Cross-Sections. Henssen DJHA; van den Heuvel L; De Jong G; Vorstenbosch MATM; van Cappellen van Walsum AM; Van den Hurk MM; Kooloos JGM; Bartels RHMA Anat Sci Educ; 2020 May; 13(3):353-365. PubMed ID: 31269322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effects of a Functional Three-dimensional (3D) Printed Knee Joint Simulator in Improving Anatomical Spatial Knowledge. Cai B; Rajendran K; Bay BH; Lee J; Yen CC Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):610-618. PubMed ID: 30536570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Students' perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study. Bergman EM; de Bruin AB; Herrler A; Verheijen IW; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP BMC Med Educ; 2013 Nov; 13():152. PubMed ID: 24252155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mixed-methods exploration of students' motivation in using augmented reality in neuroanatomy education with prosected specimens. Bölek KA; De Jong G; Van der Zee CEEM; van Cappellen van Walsum AM; Henssen DJHA Anat Sci Educ; 2022 Aug; 15(5):839-849. PubMed ID: 34218515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The skeletons in our closet: E-learning tools and what happens when one side does not fit all. Van Nuland SE; Rogers KA Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):570-588. PubMed ID: 28575530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use and effectiveness of interactive progressive drawing in anatomy education. Greene SJ Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 11(5):445-460. PubMed ID: 29624896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of virtual reality anatomy models to prosections in station-based anatomy teaching. Ail G; Freer F; Chan CS; Jones M; Broad J; Canale GP; Elston P; Leeney J; Vickerton P Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):763-769. PubMed ID: 38584323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]