187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38520579)
1. Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Chauhan H; Jiwa N; Nagarajan VR; Thiruchelvam P; Hogben K; Al-Mufti R; Hadjiminas D; Shousha S; Cutress R; Ashrafian H; Takats Z; Leff DR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):3939-3947. PubMed ID: 38520579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extent of ductal carcinoma in situ according to breast cancer subtypes: a population-based cohort study.
Doebar SC; van den Broek EC; Koppert LB; Jager A; Baaijens MHA; Obdeijn IAM; van Deurzen CHM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):179-187. PubMed ID: 27318854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.
Lepomäki M; Karhunen-Enckell U; Tuominen J; Kronqvist P; Oksala N; Murtola T; Roine A
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):577-588. PubMed ID: 34779520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ: does histologic grade or estrogen receptor status matter?
Fauveau LR; Dao TN; Wallace LB; Mamawala MK; Obaid A; Waddimba AC; Grant MD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jun; 199(2):215-220. PubMed ID: 37027122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of margin status in breast conservation surgery and its correlation with subsequent re-excision findings.
Krishnamurthy K; Febres-Aldana CA; Alghamdi S; Mesko T; Paramo J; Poppiti RJ
Pathologica; 2019 Mar; 111(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 31217620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Cavity Shave Margins on Margin Status in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Howard-McNatt M; Dupont E; Tsangaris T; Garcia-Cantu C; Chiba A; Berger AC; Levine EA; Gass JS; Ollila DW; Chagpar AB;
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Apr; 232(4):373-378. PubMed ID: 33346081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Margin width and local recurrence after breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Ekatah GE; Turnbull AK; Arthur LM; Thomas J; Dodds C; Dixon JM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2029-2035. PubMed ID: 28917445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the relationship between ductal carcinoma in situ, calcifications, and margin status in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
Bruenderman EH; Bhutiani N; Mercer MK; McMasters KM; Sanders MAG; Ajkay NL
J Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 119(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 30742316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does a Close Surgical Margin for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Invasive Breast Carcinoma Affect Breast Cancer Recurrence?
Kuru B; Yuruker S; Sullu Y; Gursel B; Ozen N
J Invest Surg; 2020 Aug; 33(7):627-633. PubMed ID: 32643476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Should New "No Ink On Tumor" Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines be Applied to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)? A Retrospective Review Using Shaved Cavity Margins.
Merrill AL; Tang R; Plichta JK; Rai U; Coopey SB; McEvoy MP; Hughes KS; Specht MC; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(11):3453-3458. PubMed ID: 27207096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast- Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines.
Thanasitthichai S; Chaiwerawattana A; Phadhana-Anake O
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4463-4467. PubMed ID: 27797262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is higher dose radiation necessary for positive resection margin after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer?
Cho WK; Choi DH; Park W; Kim H; Cha H
Breast; 2019 Oct; 47():16-21. PubMed ID: 31265973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
