186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38520579)
41. Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery-Results from a postmarketing study.
Thill M; Szwarcfiter I; Kelling K; van Haasteren V; Kolka E; Noelke J; Peles Z; Papa M; Aulmann S; Allweis T
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(3):361-368. PubMed ID: 34724205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience.
Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R
Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Valero MG; Mallory MA; Losk K; Tukenmez M; Hwang J; Camuso K; Bunnell C; King T; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):2573-2578. PubMed ID: 29786129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Factors influencing suboptimal pathologic margins and re-excision following breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ.
Dhak S; Baliski C; Bakos B
Am J Surg; 2023 May; 225(5):866-870. PubMed ID: 36894415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Factors influencing reoperation following breast-conserving surgery.
Philpott A; Wong J; Elder K; Gorelik A; Mann GB; Skandarajah A
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):922-927. PubMed ID: 29763991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Bracketed Localization in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Indications and Success Rates From a Single, High Volume, Academic Breast Cancer Center.
Lyons W; Lamm R; Duffner ER; Shames J; Willis AI; Lazar M
Am Surg; 2023 Nov; 89(11):4373-4378. PubMed ID: 35758520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Does margin width impact breast cancer recurrence rates in women with breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ?
Livingston-Rosanoff D; Trentham-Dietz A; Hampton JM; Newcomb PA; Wilke LG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Sep; 189(2):463-470. PubMed ID: 34129117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Predictors of Reexcision following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Lamb LR; Mercaldo S; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):1390-1397. PubMed ID: 32914389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Association of surgical margins with local recurrence in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Lin J; Lin KJ; Wang YF; Huang LH; Chen SL; Chen DR
BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):451. PubMed ID: 32434493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Can Selective Image-Guided Intraoperative Margin Resection Improve Re-Excision Rates after Lumpectomy in Ductal Carcinoma
Gray K; Ayabe R; Shover A; Moazzez A; Ozao-Choy J; Dauphine C
Am Surg; 2018 Oct; 84(10):1580-1583. PubMed ID: 30747673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Radioactive Seed Versus Wire-Guided Localization for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Comparable Resection Margins.
Agahozo MC; Berghuis SAM; van den Broek E; Koppert LB; Obdeijn IM; van Deurzen CHM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 27(13):5296-5302. PubMed ID: 32578065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Mastectomy or Margin Re-excision? A Nomogram for Close/Positive Margins After Lumpectomy for DCIS.
Martins Maia C; Siderides C; Jaffer S; Weltz C; Cate S; Ahn S; Boolbol S; Ru M; Moshier E; Port E; Schmidt H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):3740-3748. PubMed ID: 35066720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.
Vetter C; Ashok A; Perez M; Musaad S; Rahimi G; Gohil K; Higham A
Breast J; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1960-1965. PubMed ID: 33078470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Low rate of positive margins and re-excision after partial mastectomy in highly selected breast cancer patients: A Chinese single-institution experience.
Wu S; Zhu Y; Yang Z; Mo M; Gao H; Yang W; Liu G
Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(7):12225-12233. PubMed ID: 28103572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Dillon MF; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; Hill AD; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 17443388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery.
Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV
Clin Imaging; 2019; 57():45-49. PubMed ID: 31128385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Chagpar A; Yen T; Sahin A; Hunt KK; Whitman GJ; Ames FC; Ross MI; Meric-Bernstam F; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Kuerer HM
Am J Surg; 2003 Oct; 186(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 14553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
