These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3852077)
1. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology. Warnock M Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee. Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do human cells have rights? Warnock M Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11649757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An ambiguity in Warnock. Hare RM Bioethics; 1987 Apr; 1(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 11649833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific research must have a moral basis. Warnock M New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1430):36. PubMed ID: 11658551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New techniques in the field of human fertilization and embryology. Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly Hum Reprod; 1986 Jun; 1(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 11643963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral philosophy and public policy: the case of NRTs. Kymlicka W Bioethics; 1993 Jan; 7(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 11654026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report. Deitch R Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Council agrees response to Warnock report. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report. Gillon R Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time to break down taboos about infertility. Templeton AA New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):39. PubMed ID: 11658552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization. Gregoratos B Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Virgin births and sterile debates: anthropology and the new reproductive technologies. Shore C; Abrahams RG; Collier JF; Delaney C; Fox R; Frankenberg R; Lambert HS; Melhuus M; Schneider DM; Stolcke V; Wolfram S Curr Anthropol; 1992 Jun; 33(3):295-314. PubMed ID: 11659550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues. Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. British panel grapples with IVF issue, proposes legislation, surrogacy ban. Med World News; 1984 Aug; 25(15):28. PubMed ID: 11645522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. Kass LR New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]