294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3852077)
1. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
Warnock M
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do human cells have rights?
Warnock M
Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11649757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An ambiguity in Warnock.
Hare RM
Bioethics; 1987 Apr; 1(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 11649833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
Priest JA
Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific research must have a moral basis.
Warnock M
New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1430):36. PubMed ID: 11658551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New techniques in the field of human fertilization and embryology.
Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly
Hum Reprod; 1986 Jun; 1(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 11643963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral philosophy and public policy: the case of NRTs.
Kymlicka W
Bioethics; 1993 Jan; 7(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 11654026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
Deitch R
Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Council agrees response to Warnock report.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
Gillon R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time to break down taboos about infertility.
Templeton AA
New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):39. PubMed ID: 11658552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Commons debates Warnock report.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization.
Gregoratos B
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Virgin births and sterile debates: anthropology and the new reproductive technologies.
Shore C; Abrahams RG; Collier JF; Delaney C; Fox R; Frankenberg R; Lambert HS; Melhuus M; Schneider DM; Stolcke V; Wolfram S
Curr Anthropol; 1992 Jun; 33(3):295-314. PubMed ID: 11659550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Lords oppose embryo research.
New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1429):6. PubMed ID: 11655672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D
J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developments in biotechnology: ethical perspectives.
O'Rourke K
Linacre Q; 1989 Nov; 56(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 11659198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. British panel grapples with IVF issue, proposes legislation, surrogacy ban.
Med World News; 1984 Aug; 25(15):28. PubMed ID: 11645522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
Kass LR
New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
