These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38520954)

  • 1. Women's caesarean section preferences: A multicountry cross-sectional survey in low- and middle-income countries.
    Etcheverry C; Betrán AP; de Loenzien M; Kaboré C; Lumbiganon P; Carroli G; Mac QNH; Gialdini C; Dumont A;
    Midwifery; 2024 May; 132():103979. PubMed ID: 38520954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does hospital organisation influence the use of caesarean sections in low- and middle-income countries? A cross-sectional survey in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Vietnam for the QUALI-DEC project.
    Etcheverry C; Betrán AP; de Loenzien M; Robson M; Kaboré C; Lumbiganon P; Carroli G; Mac QNH; Gialdini C; Dumont A;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Jan; 24(1):67. PubMed ID: 38233792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.
    Long Q; Kingdon C; Yang F; Renecle MD; Jahanfar S; Bohren MA; Betran AP
    PLoS Med; 2018 Oct; 15(10):e1002672. PubMed ID: 30325928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
    Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
    Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.
    Mazzoni A; Althabe F; Gutierrez L; Gibbons L; Liu NH; Bonotti AM; Izbizky GH; Ferrary M; Viergue N; Vigil SI; Zalazar Denett G; Belizán JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():34. PubMed ID: 26857448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.
    Rivo JC; Amyx M; Pingray V; Casale RA; Fiorillo AE; Krupitzki HB; Malamud JD; Mendilaharzu M; Medina ML; Del Pino AB; Ribola L; Schvartzman JA; Tartalo GM; Trasmonte M; Varela S; Althabe F; Belizán JM;
    BJOG; 2018 Sep; 125(10):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29325216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing the QUALI-DEC project in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Viet Nam: a process delineation and theory-driven process evaluation protocol.
    Cleeve A; Annerstedt KS; Betrán AP; Mölsted Alvesson H; Kaboré Wendyam C; Carroli G; Lumbiganon P; Nhu Hung MQ; Zamboni K; Opiyo N; Bohren MA; El Halabi S; Gialdini C; Vila Ortiz M; Escuriet R; Robson M; Dumont A; Hanson C
    Glob Health Action; 2023 Dec; 16(1):2290636. PubMed ID: 38133667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation and evaluation of nonclinical interventions for appropriate use of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a multisite hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III trial.
    Dumont A; Betrán AP; Kaboré C; de Loenzien M; Lumbiganon P; Bohren MA; Mac QNH; Opiyo N; Carroli G; Annerstedt KS; Ridde V; Escuriet R; Robson M; Hanson C;
    Implement Sci; 2020 Sep; 15(1):72. PubMed ID: 32887669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway.
    Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM; Nyland Bjørgo M; Lukasse M; Schei B; Henriksen L
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():206-212. PubMed ID: 29804768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.
    Coates D; Thirukumar P; Spear V; Brown G; Henry A
    Women Birth; 2020 Jul; 33(4):323-333. PubMed ID: 31607640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
    Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences.
    Colomar M; Opiyo N; Kingdon C; Long Q; Nion S; Bohren MA; Betran AP
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251072. PubMed ID: 33951101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preference of birth mode and postnatal health related quality of life after one previous caesarean section in three European countries.
    Fobelets M; Beeckman K; Buyl R; Healy P; Grylka-Baeschlin S; Nicoletti J; Canepa M; Devane D; Gross MM; Morano S; Daly D; Begley C; Putman K
    Midwifery; 2019 Dec; 79():102536. PubMed ID: 31561129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Questionnaire survey on women's views after a first caesarean delivery in two tertiary centres in Ireland and their preference for involvement in a future randomised trial on mode of birth.
    Ryan G; O Doherty KC; Devane D; McAuliffe F; Morrison J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031766. PubMed ID: 31585976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with Chinese pregnant women's preference for a cesarean section based on the theory of planned behaviour.
    Sun N; Yin X; Qiu L; Yang Q; Shi X; Chang J; Feng L; Gong Y
    Trop Med Int Health; 2020 Feb; 25(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 31677204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Mazzoni A; Althabe F; Liu NH; Bonotti AM; Gibbons L; Sánchez AJ; Belizán JM
    BJOG; 2011 Mar; 118(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 21134103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comprehensive systematic review of factors influencing women's birthing preferences.
    Bt Maznin NL; Creedy DK
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(4):232-306. PubMed ID: 27819971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.
    Ryding EL; Lukasse M; Kristjansdottir H; Steingrimsdottir T; Schei B;
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Sep; 37(3):75-83. PubMed ID: 27269591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.
    Chen I; Opiyo N; Tavender E; Mortazhejri S; Rader T; Petkovic J; Yogasingam S; Taljaard M; Agarwal S; Laopaiboon M; Wasiak J; Khunpradit S; Lumbiganon P; Gruen RL; Betran AP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Sep; 9(9):CD005528. PubMed ID: 30264405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.