133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38521232)
1. Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study.
Wagenaar LP; van Vugt WLJ; Huppelschoten AG; Radder CM; Peters LW; Weyers S; van Wessel S; Schoot BC; Hamerlynck TWO; van Vliet HA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38521232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hysteroscopic morcellation vs. curettage for removal of retained products of conception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Wagenaar LP; Hamerlynck TW; Radder CM; Peters LW; Weyers S; Schoot BC; van Vliet HA
Fertil Steril; 2023 Dec; 120(6):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 37657600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Operative hysteroscopy versus ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration for removal of retained products of conception: A prospective cohort study.
Wagenaar LP; van Vliet HA; Radder CM; Peters LW; Weyers S; Schoot BC; Hamerlynck TW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Dec; 20():100230. PubMed ID: 37701632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception.
van Wessel S; Coryn N; van Vliet H; Schoot B; Weyers S; Hamerlynck T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):840-846. PubMed ID: 31352066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A "See and Treat" Office Procedure for Retained Products of Conception Removal After Normal Vaginal Delivery Using Manual Vacuum Aspiration: Preliminary Efficacy and Reproductive Outcomes.
Karavani G; Bahar R; Herzberg S; Yanai N
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 28642091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Loop Resection for Removal of Placental Remnants: A Randomized Trial.
Hamerlynck TW; van Vliet HA; Beerens AS; Weyers S; Schoot BC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 27590568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical and Reproductive Outcomes after Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Vitale SG; Parry JP; Carugno J; Cholkeri-Singh A; Della Corte L; Cianci S; Schiattarella A; Riemma G; De Franciscis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):204-217. PubMed ID: 33166659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive performance of women with and without intrauterine adhesions following recurrent dilatation and curettage for miscarriage: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Hooker AB; de Leeuw RA; Twisk JWR; Brölmann HAM; Huirne JAF
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jan; 36(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 33320197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trophoblastic microcirculation occlusion as an adjunct to electric vacuum aspiration for the treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.
Sun W; Gao J; Fei X; Jin X; Li D
Fertil Steril; 2023 Jan; 119(1):146-150. PubMed ID: 36456211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operative Hysteroscopy vs Vacuum Aspiration for Incomplete Spontaneous Abortion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Huchon C; Drioueche H; Koskas M; Agostini A; Bauville E; Bourdel N; Fernandez H; Fritel X; Graesslin O; Legendre G; Lucot JP; Panel P; Raiffort C; Giraudet G; Bussières L; Fauconnier A
JAMA; 2023 Apr; 329(14):1197-1205. PubMed ID: 37039805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Zizolfi B; Saccone G; Ferrara C; Sglavo G; De Angelis MC; Mastantuoni E; Bifulco G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):437.e1-437.e7. PubMed ID: 37142075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine adhesion in ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) versus electric vacuum aspiration (EVA): a randomised controlled trial.
Chung JPW; Law TSM; Ng K; Ip PNP; Li TC
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Feb; 24(1):135. PubMed ID: 38355420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception Implanted Over a Focal Area of Adenomyosis: A Case Report.
Alonso L; Nieto L; Carugno J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):382-383. PubMed ID: 28939480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: A systematic review.
Taylor C; Ellett L; Hiscock R; Mooney S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Feb; 62(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 34751942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysteroscopic resection for management of early pregnancy loss: a case report and literature review.
Young S; Miller CE
F S Rep; 2022 Jun; 3(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 35789723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Office hysteroscopy in removing retained products of conception - a highly successful approach with minimal complications.
Jakopič Maček K; Blaganje M; Kenda Šuster N; Drusany Starič K; Kobal B
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Nov; 40(8):1122-1126. PubMed ID: 31793362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative approach for removal of placental remnants: hysteroscopic morcellation.
Hamerlynck TW; Blikkendaal MD; Schoot BC; Hanstede MM; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 24183271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Live birth rate and obstetric complications following the hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions including Asherman syndrome.
Deans R; Vancaillie T; Ledger W; Liu J; Abbott JA
Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1847-1853. PubMed ID: 30239778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Pilot Study of Guided Conservative Hysteroscopic Evacuation of Early Miscarriage.
Weinberg S; Pansky M; Burshtein I; Beller U; Goldstein H; Barel O
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1860-1867. PubMed ID: 33951488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysteroscopic management versus ultrasound-guided evacuation for women with first-trimester pregnancy loss, a randomised controlled trial.
Meshaal H; Salah E; Fawzy E; Abdel-Rasheed M; Maged A; Saad H
BMC Womens Health; 2022 May; 22(1):190. PubMed ID: 35614405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
