117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38521237)
1. Impact of the superimposition methods and the designated comparison area on accuracy analyses in dentate models.
Limones A; Molinero-Mourelle P; Çakmak G; Abou-Ayash S; Delgado S; Martínez Vázquez de Parga JA; Celemín A
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():104939. PubMed ID: 38521237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the superimposition methods on accuracy analyses in complete-arch digital implant investigation.
Limones A; Cascos R; Molinero-Mourelle P; Abou-Ayash S; de Parga JAMV; Celemin A; Gómez-Polo M
J Dent; 2024 May; 147():105081. PubMed ID: 38797486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the superimposition reference area on intraoral scanning accuracy in a partially dentate maxilla.
Negm EE; Patel M; Ryan P
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):189.e1-189.e11. PubMed ID: 38556406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study.
Revilla-León M; Quesada-Olmo N; Gómez-Polo M; Sicilia E; Farjas-Abadia M; Kois JC
J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103851. PubMed ID: 34656658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the influence of palate scanning on the accuracy of complete-arch digital impressions-An in vitro study.
Schmalzl J; Keskeny GÁ; Hermann P; Pál A; Géczi Z; Borbély J; Róth I
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105014. PubMed ID: 38648874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations.
Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner.
Müller P; Ender A; Joda T; Katsoulis J
Quintessence Int; 2016 Apr; 47(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 26824085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of the effects of cutting off, overlapping, and rescanning procedures on intraoral scanning accuracy.
Revilla-León M; Sicilia E; Agustín-Panadero R; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):746-754. PubMed ID: 34998582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Best-Fit Algorithm Influences on Virtual Casts' Alignment Discrepancies.
Revilla-León M; Gohil A; Barmak AB; Zandinejad A; Raigrodski AJ; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):331-339. PubMed ID: 35524587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study.
Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
Osman RB; Alharbi NM
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Li H; Yamada S; Matsuoka T; Ono S; Nakano T
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 33829613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Superimposition of virtual models using palatal rugae and maximum habitual intercuspation.
Holz IS; Carvalho FAR; Almeida RCC
Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(2):e24spe2. PubMed ID: 38775602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models.
Henninger E; Vasilakos G; Halazonetis D; Gkantidis N
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10501. PubMed ID: 31324833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring the impact of the extent of the partially edentulous area on the accuracy of two intraoral scanners.
Alfaraj A; Khanlar LN; Lin WS; Zandinejad A
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):163.e1-163.e8. PubMed ID: 37891042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
