117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38521237)
21. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M
J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners.
Akl MA; Daifallah K; Pérez-Barquero JA; Barmak AB; Wee AG; Revilla-León M
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):125-134. PubMed ID: 37591814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dimensional stability of 3D-printed edentulous and fully dentate hollowed maxillary models over periods of time.
Zarbah M; Aldowah O; Alqahtani NM; Alqahtani SA; Alamri M; Alshahrani R; Mohsinah N
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):495. PubMed ID: 38671430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Registration of serial maxillary models via the weighted rugae superimposition method.
Abdi AH; Nouri M
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 May; 20(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 28150411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the effect of different core substrates on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
Khoshkhahesh M; Enteghad S; Aghasadeghi K; Farzin M; Taghva M; Mosadad SA
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e899. PubMed ID: 38752461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Facial scanning accuracy depending on the alignment algorithm and digitized surface area location: An in vitro study.
Revilla-León M; Pérez-Barquero JA; Barmak BA; Agustín-Panadero R; Fernández-Estevan L; Att W
J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103680. PubMed ID: 33901605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC
J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans.
Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M
J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of a patient 3-dimensional virtual representation obtained from the superimposition of facial and intraoral scans guided by extraoral and intraoral scan body systems.
Revilla-León M; Zandinejad A; Nair MK; Barmak AB; Feilzer AJ; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):984-993. PubMed ID: 33838919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study.
Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of 3D-printed denture teeth.
Alalawi H; Al-Qarni FD; Gad MM
Saudi Dent J; 2023 May; 35(4):365-371. PubMed ID: 37251714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Accuracy Between a Conventional and Two Digital Intraoral Impression Techniques.
Malik J; Rodriguez J; Weisbloom M; Petridis H
Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29518805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
