These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38521249)
1. Minimum 2-Year Outcomes of a Modern Monoblock Titanium Fluted Tapered Revision Stem for Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Alqahtani Y; Somerville LE; Vasarhelyi EM; Howard JL; Lanting BA; Naudie DDR; MacDonald SJ; McCalden RW J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S1):S208-S212. PubMed ID: 38521249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures. Otero JE; Martin JR; Rowe TM; Odum SM; Mason JB J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1069-1073. PubMed ID: 31870582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Huang Y; Zhou Y; Shao H; Gu J; Tang H; Tang Q J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3108-3113. PubMed ID: 28602532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. Siljander BR; Chandi SK; Coxe FR; Nguyen JT; Sculco PK; Chalmers BP; Bostrom MP; Gausden EB J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S1):S213-S219. PubMed ID: 38537840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem. Hellman MD; Kearns SM; Bohl DD; Haughom BD; Levine BR J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3698-3703. PubMed ID: 28803814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components. Clair AJ; Gabor JA; Patel KS; Friedlander S; Deshmukh AJ; Schwarzkopf R J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S299-S303. PubMed ID: 32253066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Monoblock Fluted Titanium-Tapered Stem for Paprosky IIIa, IIIb, and IV Femoral Bone Defects. Passano B; Oakley CT; Lutes WB; Incavo SJ; Park KJ; Schwarzkopf R J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1342-1348. PubMed ID: 36731584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence and Predictors of Subsidence Using Modular, Tapered, Fluted Titanium Femoral Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Baldwin TJ; Deckard ER; Buller LT; Meneghini RM J Arthroplasty; 2024 May; 39(5):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 37924992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modern Revision Femoral Stem Designs Have No Difference in Rates of Subsidence. Yacovelli S; Ottaway J; Banerjee S; Courtney PM J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 32863074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs. Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem. Gabor JA; Padilla JA; Feng JE; Schnaser E; Lutes WB; Park KJ; Incavo S; Vigdorchik J; Schwarzkopf R Bone Joint J; 2020 Feb; 102-B(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 32009430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No Difference in Subsidence Between Modern Monoblock and Modular Titanium Fluted Tapered Femoral Stems. Pomeroy E; Lim JBT; Vasarhelyi EM; Naudie DDR; Lanting B; MacDonald SJ; McCalden RW; Howard JL J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S223-S228. PubMed ID: 36963526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Contemporary Triple-Tapered Titanium Stem. Carlson SW; Goetz DD; Liu SS; Greiner JJ; Callaghan JJ J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-6. PubMed ID: 27339824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Abdel MP; Cottino U; Larson DR; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):873-881. PubMed ID: 28509828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Is the Long-term (27- to 32-year) Survivorship of an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Femoral Component and Survival in Patients Younger Than 50 Years? Streit MR; Lehner B; Peitgen DS; Innmann MM; Omlor GW; Walker T; Merle C; Moradi B Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 32187099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral Bone Remodeling in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of Modular Compared with Monoblock Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems: The Role of Stem Length and Stiffness. Huang Y; Shao H; Zhou Y; Gu J; Tang H; Yang D J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 101(6):531-538. PubMed ID: 30893234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modern Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem. Wallace CN; Chang JS; Kayani B; Moriarty PD; Tahmassebi JE; Haddad FS J Arthroplasty; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3697-3702. PubMed ID: 32713726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is There a Benefit to Modularity for Femoral Revisions When Using a Splined, Tapered Titanium Stem? Cohn MR; Tetreault MW; Li J; Kunze KN; Nahhas CR; Michalski JF; Levine BR; Nam D J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S278-S283. PubMed ID: 32067894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-Term Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered and Fluted Modular Stem: A Mean Follow-Up of 16 Years. Park CW; Lee JH; Shin SS; Moon YW; Lim SJ; Park YS J Arthroplasty; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2420-2426. PubMed ID: 35753649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]