These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38522218)
21. Stepping Outside the Echo Chamber: Is Intellectual Humility Associated With Less Political Myside Bias? Bowes SM; Costello TH; Lee C; McElroy-Heltzel S; Davis DE; Lilienfeld SO Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Jan; 48(1):150-164. PubMed ID: 33719720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics. Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Emphasizing Similarities Between Politically Opposed Groups and Their Influence in Perceptions of the Political Opposition: Evidence From Five Experiments. Syropoulos S; Leidner B Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Sep; ():1461672231192384. PubMed ID: 37667660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Strategic identity signaling in heterogeneous networks. van der Does T; Galesic M; Dunivin ZO; Smaldino PE Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Mar; 119(10):e2117898119. PubMed ID: 35239438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Krizan Z; Miller JC; Johar O Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20424035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Role of Deliberative Cognitive Styles in Preventing Belief in Politicized COVID-19 Misinformation. Lee SJ; Lee CJ; Hwang H Health Commun; 2023 Dec; 38(13):2904-2914. PubMed ID: 36134653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Polarized imagination: partisanship influences the direction and consequences of counterfactual thinking. Epstude K; Effron DA; Roese NJ Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210342. PubMed ID: 36314153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication. Pennycook G; Bago B; McPhetres J J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 35925740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion debates in Finland and the Republic of Ireland: textual analysis of experiential thinking and argumentation in parliamentary and layperson discussions. Mustonen AM; Paakkonen T; Ryökäs E; Nieminen P Reprod Health; 2017 Dec; 14(1):163. PubMed ID: 29197399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. "They just don't understand us": The role of felt understanding in intergroup relations. Livingstone AG; Fernández Rodríguez L; Rothers A J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Sep; 119(3):633-656. PubMed ID: 31647274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Taking another's perspective promotes right parieto-frontal activity that reflects open-minded thought. Miura N; Sugiura M; Nozawa T; Yamamoto Y; Sasaki Y; Hamamoto Y; Yamazaki S; Hirano K; Takahashi M; Kawashima R Soc Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 15(3):282-295. PubMed ID: 31888419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Cognitive explanations of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia: An inventory of the scientific literature]. Livet A; Salomé F Encephale; 2020 Jun; 46(3):217-221. PubMed ID: 32156419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing. Nyhan B; Settle J; Thorson E; Wojcieszak M; Barberá P; Chen AY; Allcott H; Brown T; Crespo-Tenorio A; Dimmery D; Freelon D; Gentzkow M; González-Bailón S; Guess AM; Kennedy E; Kim YM; Lazer D; Malhotra N; Moehler D; Pan J; Thomas DR; Tromble R; Rivera CV; Wilkins A; Xiong B; de Jonge CK; Franco A; Mason W; Stroud NJ; Tucker JA Nature; 2023 Aug; 620(7972):137-144. PubMed ID: 37500978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. Baldassarri D; Gelman A AJS; 2008 Jan; 114(2):408-446. PubMed ID: 24932012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election. Miller JD; Woods LT; Kalmbach J Elect Stud; 2022 Dec; 80():102548. PubMed ID: 36311165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Electoral Consequences of Affective Polarization? Negative Voting in the 2020 US Presidential Election. Garzia D; Ferreira da Silva F Am Polit Res; 2022 May; 50(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 35469326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Partisan mathematical processing of political polling statistics: It's the expectations that count. Niemi L; Woodring M; Young L; Cordes S Cognition; 2019 May; 186():95-107. PubMed ID: 30769197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'. Darius P Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):151. PubMed ID: 36246430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How to study political activists: A petition survey approach. Durso R; Craig Jenkins J; Martin A; Stearmer M Soc Sci Res; 2018 Jul; 73():207-220. PubMed ID: 29793687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]