These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38522325)

  • 21. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation.
    Meuwly D; Ramos D; Haraksim R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():142-153. PubMed ID: 27181589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV.
    Vergeer P; van Schaik Y; Sjerps M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110722. PubMed ID: 33684845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence-based diagnostic accuracy measurement in urine cytology using likelihood ratios.
    Myles N; Auger M; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Kassouf W; Brimo F
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 33071190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Strength of linguistic text evidence: A fused forensic text comparison system.
    Ishihara S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():184-197. PubMed ID: 28735218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
    Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidential value of duct tape comparison using loopbreaking patterns.
    van Dijk CD; van Someren A; Visser R; Sjerps M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Mar; 332():111178. PubMed ID: 35144156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):374-379. PubMed ID: 27702454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating Likelihood Ratio (LR) for firearm evidence identifications in forensic science based on the Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) method.
    Song J; Chen Z; Vorburger TV; Soons JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110502. PubMed ID: 33007728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
    Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison.
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Hughes V; Jessen M; Meuwly D; Neumann C; Planting S; Thompson WC; van der Vloed D; Ypma RJF; Zhang C; Anonymous A; Anonymous B
    Sci Justice; 2021 May; 61(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 33985678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Likelihood ratio and posterior odds in forensic genetics: Two sides of the same coin.
    Caliebe A; Walsh S; Liu F; Kayser M; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():203-210. PubMed ID: 28314239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of glass evidence at activity level: A new distribution for the background population.
    Vergeer P; Leegwater AJ; Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110431. PubMed ID: 32980719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multi-laboratory validation of DNAxs including the statistical library DNAStatistX.
    Benschop CCG; Hoogenboom J; Bargeman F; Hovers P; Slagter M; van der Linden J; Parag R; Kruise D; Drobnic K; Klucevsek G; Parson W; Berger B; Laurent FX; Faivre M; Ulus A; Schneider P; Bogus M; Kneppers ALJ; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102390. PubMed ID: 32937255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: definition, numbers, impact and communication.
    Kloosterman A; Sjerps M; Quak A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():77-85. PubMed ID: 24905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and validation of a fast and automated DNA identification line.
    Benschop CCG; Slagter M; Nagel JHA; Hovers P; Tuinman S; Duijs FE; Grol LJW; Jegers M; Berghout A; van der Zwan AW; Ypma RJF; de Jong J; Kneppers ALJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Sep; 60():102738. PubMed ID: 35691141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does an English appeal court ruling increase the risks of miscarriages of justice when complex DNA profiles are searched against the national DNA database?
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():167-75. PubMed ID: 25151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of Bayesian networks in forensic soil casework.
    Uitdehaag SCA; Donders TH; Kuiper I; Wagner-Cremer F; Sjerps MJ
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 35277237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multi-element comparisons of tapes evidence using dimensionality reduction for calculating likelihood ratios.
    Gupta A; Martinez-Lopez C; Curran JM; Almirall JR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():426-434. PubMed ID: 31229846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.