These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3852349)

  • 21. Forewarned is forearmed.
    Coombes R
    Nurs Times; 1999 Sep 8-14; 95(36):12-3. PubMed ID: 10661238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nurse and the law. Expert evidence.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1989 Nov; 19(5):30-1. PubMed ID: 2590089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Legal case briefs for nurses. LA: injection: sciatic nerve damage. NY: controlled substances: license suspension.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Sep; 25(4):3. PubMed ID: 6566373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Must nurses perform tests not ordered? Case in point: Northeast Ala. Reg. Med. Ctr. v. Owens (584 So. 2d 1360--AL (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Dec; 32(7):4. PubMed ID: 1767027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "No independent recollection": blockbuster damages. Case in point: Atkins v. Lee (603 So. 2d 937-AL [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):2. PubMed ID: 1494663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Administering injections--legal questions. Areas of responsibilities for the physician--patient education responsibility--case report: injections by the physicians assistant].
    Binder G
    Fortschr Med; 1996 Jun; 114(17):221-2. PubMed ID: 8767298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nurse-expert fails to 'go to bat' in testifying for plaintiffs. Case on point: Ross v. Redding Medical Center, 2003 WL 21246105-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Jun; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 12886709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Was apnea monitor on or off? Expert testimony. Case in point: Dent v. Memorial Hosp. of Adel, Inc. (408 S.E.2d 473--GA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jan; 32(8):2. PubMed ID: 1542727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nurse "log rolls" solo: adverse effects. Case in point: Routh v. St. John's Mercy Med. Center (785 S.W. 2d 744--MO (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jul; 31(2):4. PubMed ID: 2377732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. GA: is alleged negligence same as malpractice?: is expert medical testimony needed for negligence?
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Feb; 44(9):3. PubMed ID: 15038329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Legal case briefs for nurses. N.Y.: incident reports: legal distinctions. AL.: hospital holds newborn for ransom.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Aug; 28(3):3. PubMed ID: 3650921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient leaps to death: nursing supervision. Case in point: Palermo v. NME Hospitals, Inc. (558 So. 2d 1342--LA (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jun; 31(1):4. PubMed ID: 2371409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nurse-expert's opinion inadmissible re 'cause of death'.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Mar; 41(10):1. PubMed ID: 11995187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. KY: unlicensed nurse expert's testimony excluded: selecting 'wrong expert' can be fatal to case.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Apr; 43(11):3. PubMed ID: 12764979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nurses failed to respond to Ob/Gyn patient's pleas for help. Case on point: Nasser v. St. Vincent Hospital Health Svcs., 49A020919-CV-955, (4/14/2010)-IN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 May; 50(12):4. PubMed ID: 20557021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Court erred in failure to allow dr.'s expert opinion.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Apr; 47(11):2. PubMed ID: 17491278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Plaintiffs' expert's opinion rejected as 'conclusory'.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Nov; 49(6):2. PubMed ID: 19127935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. RN's expert testimony not 'required'--not 'barred'. Case on point: Davis v. Montgomery Cnty. Mem. Hosp., No. 6-086/05 (Iowa app. 07/12/2006)-IA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jul; 47(2):2. PubMed ID: 16937912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intensive care nursing: doctor problems. Case in point: Poor Sisters v. Catron (435 N.E. 2d 305 - IN).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1982 Sep; 23(4):4. PubMed ID: 6923436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.