These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38526475)

  • 1. The FDA in the Crosshairs-Science, Politics, and Abortion.
    Fernandez Lynch H; Kesselheim AS
    JAMA; 2024 Apr; 331(15):1269-1270. PubMed ID: 38526475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the Impacts of the Supreme Court Case FDA v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.
    Espey E; Hailstorks T; Hofler L
    JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1529-1530. PubMed ID: 38526871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Physician Attack on the FDA - Will the Supreme Court Reduce Access to Mifepristone?
    Watson K
    N Engl J Med; 2024 Feb; 390(6):563-567. PubMed ID: 38265642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Supreme Court's Abortion Exceptionalism - Judicial Deference, Medical Science, and Mifepristone Access.
    Fox D; Cole E
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Jun; 384(24):e94. PubMed ID: 33909959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Requests for Abortion Medications for Future Use Surged Post-Dobbs.
    Harris E
    JAMA; 2024 Feb; 331(5):385. PubMed ID: 38231493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
    JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US Supreme Court to review "partial birth abortion" law.
    Tanne J
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7540):506. PubMed ID: 16513699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RU 486 examined: impact of a new technology on an old controversy.
    Prothro G
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1997; 30(4):715-41. PubMed ID: 16514778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
    Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explaining the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling on Mifepristone Access.
    Meegan MA
    JAMA; 2023 Dec; 330(21):2047-2048. PubMed ID: 37883078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court Intrusion Into Science and Medicine-The Mifepristone Decisions.
    Aaron DG; Brown TR; Sinha MS
    JAMA; 2023 May; 329(20):1735-1737. PubMed ID: 37099527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Commerce Clause and federal abortion law: why progressives might be tempted to embrace federalism.
    Goldberg J
    Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 75(1):301-54. PubMed ID: 17115483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What's at stake for science in 'abortion pill' case.
    Wadman M
    Science; 2024 Feb; 383(6684):689-690. PubMed ID: 38359105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coercing conscience: the effort to mandate abortion as a standard of care.
    Kramlich M
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15192848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Substantive due process after Gonzales v. Carhart.
    Calabresi SG
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1517-42. PubMed ID: 18595213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RU-486: legal and policy issues confronting the Food and Drug Administration.
    Muhl C
    J Leg Med; 1993 Jun; 14(2):319-47. PubMed ID: 8340714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protection of RU-486 as contraception, emergency contraception and as an abortifacient under the law of contraception.
    Wyser-Pratte RC
    Oregon Law Rev; 2000; 79(4):1121-56. PubMed ID: 12452141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mifepristone: US Supreme Court rejects ban on abortion drug.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2024 Jun; 385():q1321. PubMed ID: 38876498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.