115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38526943)
1. Effects of finger pinch motor imagery on short-latency afferent inhibition and corticospinal excitability.
Nakashoji K; Sasaki A; Kaneko N; Nomura T; Milosevic M
Neuroreport; 2024 Apr; 35(6):413-420. PubMed ID: 38526943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The recent history of afferent stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability.
Bonnesen MT; Fuglsang SA; Siebner HR; Christiansen L
Neuroimage; 2022 Sep; 258():119365. PubMed ID: 35690256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic modulation of corticospinal excitability and short-latency afferent inhibition during onset and maintenance phase of selective finger movement.
Cho HJ; Panyakaew P; Thirugnanasambandam N; Wu T; Hallett M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jun; 127(6):2343-9. PubMed ID: 27178851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined effect of motor imagery and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on the motor cortex.
Saito K; Yamaguchi T; Yoshida N; Tanabe S; Kondo K; Sugawara K
Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 227(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 23591692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of touching an object on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery.
Mizuguchi N; Sakamoto M; Muraoka T; Kanosue K
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 196(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 19504259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corticospinal excitability during observation and imagery of simple and complex hand tasks: implications for motor rehabilitation.
Roosink M; Zijdewind I
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 213(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 20433871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction.
Kaneko F; Hayami T; Aoyama T; Kizuka T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 11():94. PubMed ID: 24902891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Muscle-specific movement-phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during upper-limb motor execution and motor imagery combined with virtual action observation.
Suzuki Y; Kaneko N; Sasaki A; Tanaka F; Nakazawa K; Nomura T; Milosevic M
Neurosci Lett; 2021 Jun; 755():135907. PubMed ID: 33887382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motor imagery of voluntary muscle relaxation induces temporal reduction of corticospinal excitability.
Kato K; Watanabe J; Muraoka T; Kanosue K
Neurosci Res; 2015 Mar; 92():39-45. PubMed ID: 25448688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation.
Yasui T; Yamaguchi T; Tanabe S; Tatemoto T; Takahashi Y; Kondo K; Kawakami M
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 237(3):637-645. PubMed ID: 30536148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motor imagery of foot dorsiflexion and gait: effects on corticospinal excitability.
Bakker M; Overeem S; Snijders AH; Borm G; van Elswijk G; Toni I; Bloem BR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 119(11):2519-27. PubMed ID: 18838294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motor imagery of voluntary muscle relaxation of the foot induces a temporal reduction of corticospinal excitability in the hand.
Kato K; Kanosue K
Neurosci Lett; 2018 Mar; 668():67-72. PubMed ID: 29305917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactions between imagined movement and the initiation of voluntary movement: a TMS study.
Li S; Stevens JA; Rymer WZ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 120(6):1154-60. PubMed ID: 19250861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of somatosensory input on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery.
Mizuguchi N; Sakamoto M; Muraoka T; Moriyama N; Nakagawa K; Nakata H; Kanosue K
Neurosci Lett; 2012 Apr; 514(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 22402190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time changes in corticospinal excitability related to motor imagery of a force control task.
Tatemoto T; Tsuchiya J; Numata A; Osawa R; Yamaguchi T; Tanabe S; Kondo K; Otaka Y; Sugawara K
Behav Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 335():185-190. PubMed ID: 28827129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with motor imagery on the corticospinal excitability of antagonist muscles.
Asao A; Hoshino Y; Nomura T; Shibuya K
Neuroreport; 2021 Jul; 32(10):894-898. PubMed ID: 34029290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tactile versus motor imagery: differences in corticospinal excitability assessed with single-pulse TMS.
Morozova M; Nasibullina A; Yakovlev L; Syrov N; Kaplan A; Lebedev M
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14862. PubMed ID: 38937562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imagined paralysis reduces motor cortex excitability.
Hartmann M; Falconer CJ; Kaelin-Lang A; Müri RM; Mast FW
Psychophysiology; 2022 Oct; 59(10):e14069. PubMed ID: 35393640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corticospinal excitability during imagined and observed dynamic force production tasks: effortfulness matters.
Helm F; Marinovic W; Krüger B; Munzert J; Riek S
Neuroscience; 2015 Apr; 290():398-405. PubMed ID: 25639231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inhibition or facilitation? Modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery.
Bruno V; Fossataro C; Garbarini F
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():360-368. PubMed ID: 29462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
