150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38528261)
1. The evidence behind robot-assisted abdominopelvic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Choi JH; Diab AR; Tsay K; Kuruvilla D; Ganam S; Saad A; Docimo S; Sujka JA; DuCoin CG
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2371-2382. PubMed ID: 38528261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Milone M; Manigrasso M; Vertaldi S; Velotti N; Aprea G; Maione F; Gennarelli N; De Simone G; De Conno B; Pesce M; Sarnelli G; De Palma GD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Dec; 32(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 31274153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic, and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.
Kabir T; Tan HL; Syn NL; Wu EJ; Kam JH; Goh BKP
Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):476-489. PubMed ID: 34454723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.
Chang YS; Wang JX; Chang DW
J Surg Res; 2015 May; 195(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 25770742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Surgical Factors on Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cacciamani GE; Medina LG; Gill T; Abreu A; Sotelo R; Artibani W; Gill IS
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):258-274. PubMed ID: 29580709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Yuan Q; Xu Y; Wang W
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240593. PubMed ID: 33048989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brandao LF; Autorino R; Laydner H; Haber GP; Ouzaid I; De Sio M; Perdonà S; Stein RJ; Porpiglia F; Kaouk JH
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1154-61. PubMed ID: 24079955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy.
Wang J; Li X; Wu H; Zhang Y; Wang F
Dis Markers; 2020; 2020():2503753. PubMed ID: 32454902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic vs. open left lateral sectionectomy: An update meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.
Macacari RL; Coelho FF; Bernardo WM; Kruger JAP; Jeismann VB; Fonseca GM; Cesconetto DM; Cecconello I; Herman P
Int J Surg; 2019 Jan; 61():1-10. PubMed ID: 30496866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
Hu KY; Wu R; Szabo A; Ridolfi TJ; Ludwig KA; Peterson CY
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():495-501. PubMed ID: 32622164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Evidence Behind Robot-Assisted Abdominopelvic Surgery : A Systematic Review.
Dhanani NH; Olavarria OA; Bernardi K; Lyons NB; Holihan JL; Loor M; Haynes AB; Liang MK
Ann Intern Med; 2021 Aug; 174(8):1110-1117. PubMed ID: 34181448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic ureteroneocystotomy for benign and malignant ureteral lesions: a comparison of over 100 minimally invasive cases.
Elsamra SE; Theckumparampil N; Garden B; Alom M; Waingankar N; Leavitt DA; Kreshover J; Schwartz M; Kavoussi LR; Richstone L
J Endourol; 2014 Dec; 28(12):1455-9. PubMed ID: 25390972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.
Albayati S; Hitos K; Berney CR; Morgan MJ; Pathma-Nathan N; El-Khoury T; Richardson A; Chu DI; Cannon J; Kennedy G; Toh JWT
J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 36269488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis.
Ramage L; Georgiou P; Tekkis P; Tan E
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Jul; 19(7):381-9. PubMed ID: 26041559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peri-operative outcomes and complications after laparoscopic vs robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Light A; Karthikeyan S; Maruthan S; Elhage O; Danuser H; Dasgupta P
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):181-194. PubMed ID: 29453902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Credentialing for robotic lobectomy: what is the learning curve? A retrospective analysis of 272 consecutive cases by a single surgeon.
Baldonado JJAR; Amaral M; Garrett J; Moodie C; Robinson L; Keenan R; Toloza EM; Fontaine JP
J Robot Surg; 2019 Oct; 13(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 30560496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
