These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38528268)

  • 1. Diagnostic Classification Models for Testlets: Methods and Theory.
    Xu X; Fang G; Guo J; Ying Z; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2024 Sep; 89(3):851-876. PubMed ID: 38528268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Xu G; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):625-49. PubMed ID: 26155755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Fang G; Liu J; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):19-40. PubMed ID: 30673967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the Utility of Logistic Mixed Modeling Approaches to Simultaneously Investigate Item and Testlet DIF on Testlet-based Data.
    Fukuhara H; Paek I
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 26784379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generic Identifiability of the DINA Model and Blessing of Latent Dependence.
    Gu Y
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):117-131. PubMed ID: 36167947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.
    Gu Y; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):468-483. PubMed ID: 29728918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidimensional item response theory models for testlet-based doubly bounded data.
    Liu CW
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Sep; 56(6):5309-5353. PubMed ID: 37985636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A sequential cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous responses.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):253-275. PubMed ID: 27317397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fixed or random testlet effects: a comparison of two multilevel testlet models.
    Chen TA
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):231-47. PubMed ID: 23234827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical Analysis of
    Chen Y; Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015; 110(510):850-866. PubMed ID: 26294801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model and the General Diagnostic Model.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):585-610. PubMed ID: 27230079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying the
    Chen F; Liu Y; Xin T; Cui Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1875. PubMed ID: 30356781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consistency Theory for the General Nonparametric Classification Method.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):830-845. PubMed ID: 30725333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.
    Templin J; Bradshaw L
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):317-39. PubMed ID: 24478021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.