170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38528692)
21. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting.
Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 36068450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection on Mammography: Factors Related to Cancer Detection.
Yoen H; Jang MJ; Yi A; Moon WK; Chang JM
Acad Radiol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38216413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A review of computer aided detection in mammography.
Katzen J; Dodelzon K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():305-309. PubMed ID: 30216858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Consistency of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Diagnostic Support Software in Short-term Digital Mammography Reimaging After Core Needle Biopsy.
Youk JH; Han K; Lee SE; Kim EK
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Oct; 36(5):1965-1973. PubMed ID: 37326891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Artificial intelligence in breast imaging.
Le EPV; Wang Y; Huang Y; Hickman S; Gilbert FJ
Clin Radiol; 2019 May; 74(5):357-366. PubMed ID: 30898381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrospective Review of Missed Cancer Detection and Its Mammography Findings with Artificial-Intelligence-Based, Computer-Aided Diagnosis.
Park GE; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee J
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. AI analytics can be used as imaging biomarkers for predicting invasive upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yoon J; Yang J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Rho M; Yoon JH
Insights Imaging; 2024 Apr; 15(1):100. PubMed ID: 38578585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Artificial intelligence assistance for women who had spot compression view: reducing recall rates for digital mammography.
Lee SE; Kim GR; Yoon JH; Han K; Son WJ; Shin HJ; Moon HJ
Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1808-1815. PubMed ID: 36426409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient Characteristics Impact Performance of AI Algorithm in Interpreting Negative Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Studies.
Nguyen DL; Ren Y; Jones TM; Thomas SM; Lo JY; Grimm LJ
Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e232286. PubMed ID: 38771177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
Fenton JJ; Abraham L; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Carney PA; D'Orsi C; Elmore JG; Barlow WE;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21795668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Microcalcification on Mammography.
Do YA; Jang M; Yun B; Shin SU; Kim B; Kim SM
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34441343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
