These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38529924)

  • 1. Image Quality and Radiation Exposure in Abdominal Angiography: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Conventional Detector-Dose-Driven Versus Contrast-to-Noise Ratio-Driven Exposure Control at Various Source-to-Image Receptor Distances and Collimations in a Pilot Phantom and Animal Study.
    Werncke T; Becker LS; Maschke SK; Hinrichs JB; Meine TCH; Dewald CLA; Brüsch I; Rumpel R; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
    Invest Radiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38529924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a contrast-to-noise ratio-driven exposure control and a regular detector dose-driven exposure control in abdominal imaging in a clinical angiography system.
    Werncke T; Kemling M; Tashenov S; Hinrichs JB; Meine TC; Maschke SK; Kyriakou Y; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
    Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7641-7656. PubMed ID: 34651705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tantalum-specific contrast-to-noise ratio or conventional detector dose-driven exposure control in angiography: radiation dose and image quality evaluation in a porcine model.
    Werncke T; Meine TC; Hinrichs JB; Maschke SK; Becker LS; Brüsch I; Rumpel R; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2022 May; 6(1):24. PubMed ID: 35578057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography.
    Werncke T; Kemling M; Tashenov S; Hinrichs JB; Meine TC; Maschke SK; Kyriakou Y; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065020. PubMed ID: 33709957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of Radiation Dose and Image Quality for Angiographic System with Spectral Shaping Filter].
    Ichikawa N; Matsubara K; Fukuda A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 30662028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collimation and Image Quality of C-Arm Computed Tomography: Potential of Radiation Dose Reduction While Maintaining Equal Image Quality.
    Werncke T; von Falck C; Luepke M; Stamm G; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):514-21. PubMed ID: 25867655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
    Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.
    Shen Y; Yi Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Liu X; You Z; Ge S; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6429-42. PubMed ID: 22149826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kerma area product (KAP) and scatter measurements for intraoral X-ray machines using three different types of round collimation compared with rectangular beam limiter.
    Magill D; Ngo NJH; Felice MA; Mupparapu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180183. PubMed ID: 30346798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation into image quality and dose for different patient geometries with multiple cone-beam CT systems.
    Gardner SJ; Studenski MT; Giaddui T; Cui Y; Galvin J; Yu Y; Xiao Y
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031908. PubMed ID: 24593726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of effective dose and risk for different collimation options used in AP shoulder radiography.
    Singh T; Muscroft N; Collier N; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):394-399. PubMed ID: 34887196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of detector collimation and beam pitch for identification and image quality of ground-glass attenuation and nodules on 16- and 64-detector row CT systems: experimental study using chest phantom.
    Ohno Y; Koyama H; Kono A; Terada M; Inokawa H; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 17884323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Conventional and Wide-Field High-Resolution Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Cerebral Angiography: A Phantom Study.
    Kawauchi S; Chida K; Hamada Y; Tsuruta W
    Tomography; 2023 Sep; 9(5):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 37736987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biplane interventional pediatric system with cone-beam CT: dose and image quality characterization for the default protocols.
    Corredoira E; Vañó E; Alejo L; Ubeda C; Gutiérrez-Larraya F; Garayoa J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):357-376. PubMed ID: 27455474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultra-High-Resolution Coronary CT Angiography With Photon-Counting Detector CT: Feasibility and Image Characterization.
    Mergen V; Sartoretti T; Baer-Beck M; Schmidt B; Petersilka M; Wildberger JE; Euler A; Eberhard M; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2022 Dec; 57(12):780-788. PubMed ID: 35640019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual single source CT using dual source acquisition: Clinical applicability in run-off CT-angiography for intra-individual comparison of different scan protocols.
    Werncke T; Hinrichs JB; Alikhani B; Maschke S; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():149-156. PubMed ID: 29571789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using aluminum for scatter control in mammography: preliminary work using measurements of CNR and FOM.
    Al Khalifah K; Davidson R; Zhou A
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 31749130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.