BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38530401)

  • 1. Long-Term Mesh Exposure 5 Years Following Minimally Invasive Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy.
    Bretschneider CE; Myers ER; Geller EJ; Kenton KS; Henley BR; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Apr; 35(4):901-907. PubMed ID: 38530401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy.
    Matthews CA; Myers EM; Henley BR; Kenton K; Weaver E; Wu JM; Geller EJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 36322173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Matthews CA; Geller EJ; Henley BR; Kenton K; Myers EM; Dieter AA; Parnell B; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG; Wu JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):355-364. PubMed ID: 32649494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pain after permanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy.
    Bretschneider CE; Kenton K; Geller EJ; Wu JM; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2035-2041. PubMed ID: 32845399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice.
    Deffieux X; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Campagne-Loiseau S; Donon L; Levesque A; Rigaud J; Stivalet N; Venara A; Thubert T; Vidart A; Bosset PO; Revel-Delhom C; Lucot JP; Hermieu JF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Mar; 294():170-179. PubMed ID: 38280271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual Function after Minimally Invasive Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy.
    Geller EJ; Bretschneider CE; Wu JM; Kenton K; Matthews CA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):1603-1609. PubMed ID: 33515745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long term follow-up after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Khalil N; Moubarak M; Alkassis M; Kassis N; Moukarzel M; Atallah D
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jun; 34(6):1279-1283. PubMed ID: 36576540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture in Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Pollack BL; Popiel P; Toaff MC; Drugge E; Bielawski A; Sacks A; Bibi M; Friedman-Ciment R; LeBron K; Alishahian L; Phillips D; Rubino SR; Pollack S; Khan RS; Khan ES; Pape DM; Grimes CL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 141(2):268-283. PubMed ID: 36649334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Route of hysterectomy during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy does not affect postoperative outcomes.
    Davidson ERW; Thomas TN; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):649-655. PubMed ID: 30338370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Nygaard I; Brubaker L; Zyczynski HM; Cundiff G; Richter H; Gantz M; Fine P; Menefee S; Ridgeway B; Visco A; Warren LK; Zhang M; Meikle S
    JAMA; 2013 May; 309(19):2016-24. PubMed ID: 23677313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of absorbable suture and permanent suture in sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Chen S; Liu Y; Peng L; Chen Y; Shen H; Luo D
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 May; 34(5):993-1000. PubMed ID: 36598553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Recurrence and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Abdominal Uterosacral Ligament and Mesh-Augmented Sacrohysteropexy.
    Davidson ERW; Casas-Puig V; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Ferrando CA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 26(12):763-768. PubMed ID: 30845072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Das D; Carroll A; Mueller M; Kenton K; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Bretschneider CE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Sep; 33(9):2507-2514. PubMed ID: 35666287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year anatomical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using light-weight Y shaped mesh for post hysterectomy vaginal prolapse.
    Fayyad A; Harris R; Ibrahim S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():139-143. PubMed ID: 35051826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.