These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38530755)
1. OneMax is not the Easiest Function for Fitness Improvements. Kaufmann M; Larcher M; Lengler J; Zou X Evol Comput; 2024 Mar; ():1-30. PubMed ID: 38530755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On Easiest Functions for Mutation Operators in Bio-Inspired Optimisation. Corus D; He J; Jansen T; Oliveto PS; Sudholt D; Zarges C Algorithmica; 2017; 78(2):714-740. PubMed ID: 32103848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximizing Drift Is Not Optimal for Solving OneMax. Buskulic N; Doerr C Evol Comput; 2021 Dec; 29(4):521-541. PubMed ID: 33480820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When Hillclimbers Beat Genetic Algorithms in Multimodal Optimization. Lobo FG; Bazargani M Evol Comput; 2022 Dec; 30(4):535-559. PubMed ID: 35604959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fitness Probability Distribution of Bit-Flip Mutation. Chicano F; Sutton AM; Whitley LD; Alba E Evol Comput; 2015; 23(2):217-48. PubMed ID: 24885680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Runtime Analysis of Parallel Evolutionary Algorithms in Dynamic Optimization. Lissovoi A; Witt C Algorithmica; 2017; 78(2):641-659. PubMed ID: 32103847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the Effectiveness of Sampling for Evolutionary Optimization in Noisy Environments. Qian C; Yu Y; Tang K; Jin Y; Yao X; Zhou ZH Evol Comput; 2018; 26(2):237-267. PubMed ID: 27982697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probabilistic Analysis of the (1+1)-Evolutionary Algorithm. Hwang HK; Panholzer A; Rolin N; Tsai TH; Chen WM Evol Comput; 2018; 26(2):299-345. PubMed ID: 28632396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A sharp minimum on the mean number of steps taken in adaptive walks. Rosenberg NA J Theor Biol; 2005 Nov; 237(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 15979094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monotonicity of fitness landscapes and mutation rate control. Belavkin RV; Channon A; Aston E; Aston J; Krašovec R; Knight CG J Math Biol; 2016 Dec; 73(6-7):1491-1524. PubMed ID: 27072124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computational Complexity as an Ultimate Constraint on Evolution. Kaznatcheev A Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):245-265. PubMed ID: 30833289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictable properties of fitness landscapes induced by adaptational tradeoffs. Das SG; Direito SO; Waclaw B; Allen RJ; Krug J Elife; 2020 May; 9():. PubMed ID: 32423531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Host-parasite coevolution promotes innovation through deformations in fitness landscapes. Gupta A; Zaman L; Strobel HM; Gallie J; Burmeister AR; Kerr B; Tamar ES; Kishony R; Meyer JR Elife; 2022 Jul; 11():. PubMed ID: 35793223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unbiased inference of the fitness landscape ruggedness from imprecise fitness estimates. Song S; Zhang J Evolution; 2021 Nov; 75(11):2658-2671. PubMed ID: 34554581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]