119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38531182)
1. Aging processes in dental thermoplastics - Thermoanalytical investigations and effects on Vickers as well as Martens hardness.
Kreitczick J; Schmohl L; Hahnel S; Vejjasilpa K; Schulz-Siegmund M; Koenig A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jun; 154():106501. PubMed ID: 38531182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media.
Liebermann A; Wimmer T; Schmidlin PR; Scherer H; Löffler P; Roos M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):321-8.e2. PubMed ID: 26548869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of various 3D printed and milled PAEK materials: Effect of printing direction and artificial aging on Martens parameters.
Prechtel A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Hickel R; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2020 Feb; 36(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31785832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of artificial aging by thermocycling on edge chipping resistance and Martens hardness of different dental CAD-CAM restorative materials.
Hampe R; Theelke B; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 32115219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation and assessment of the wettabilty and water contact angle of modified poly methyl methacrylate denture base materials against PEEK in cast partial denture framework: an in vitro study.
Narde J; Ahmed N; Siurkel Y; Marrapodi MM; Ronsivalle V; Cicciù M; Minervini G
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):248. PubMed ID: 38368396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the heating/quenching process on the mechanical, optical and thermodynamic properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) films.
Bodden L; Lümkemann N; Köhler V; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 29029849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of three food-simulating liquids on the roughness and hardness of CAD/CAM polymer composites.
Babaier R; Watts DC; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):874-885. PubMed ID: 35431089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hardness measured with traditional Vickers and Martens hardness methods.
Shahdad SA; McCabe JF; Bull S; Rusby S; Wassell RW
Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17141860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PEEK and PMMA: An
Shrivastava SP; Dable R; Raj APN; Mutneja P; Srivastava SB; Haque M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):179-183. PubMed ID: 34257179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of polymerization technique and glass fiber addition on the surface roughness and hardness of PMMA denture base material.
Gad MM; Rahoma A; Al-Thobity AM
Dent Mater J; 2018 Sep; 37(5):746-753. PubMed ID: 29925729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of artificial aging on Martens hardness and indentation modulus of different dental CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Hampe R; Lümkemann N; Sener B; Stawarczyk B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Oct; 86():191-198. PubMed ID: 29986293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study on the surface properties of different commercially available CAD/CAM materials for implant-supported restorations.
Vulović S; Todorović A; Stančić I; Popovac A; Stašić JN; Vencl A; Milić-Lemić A
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Oct; 34(7):1132-1141. PubMed ID: 35997320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of surface roughness, hardness and elastic modulus of nanoparticle containing light-polymerized denture glaze materials.
Choi JJE; Uy CE; Ramani RS; Waddell JN
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103601. PubMed ID: 32090930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modern CAD/CAM silicate ceramics, their translucency level and impact of hydrothermal aging on translucency, Martens hardness, biaxial flexural strength and their reliability.
Stawarczyk B; Mandl A; Liebermann A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jun; 118():104456. PubMed ID: 33740686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wear resistance of a modified polymethyl methacrylate artificial tooth compared to five commercially available artificial tooth materials.
Kamonwanon P; Yodmongkol S; Chantarachindawong R; Thaweeboon S; Thaweeboon B; Srikhirin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 25882971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation on surface nanohardness, surface microhardness, surface roughness, and wettability of plant-based organic nanoparticle reinforced polyetheretherketone as an implant material - An in vitro study.
Vidhyasankari N; John RR; Senthilmurugan PR; Vishnupriya V
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jul; 24(3):245-251. PubMed ID: 38946507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discoloration of PMMA, composite, and PEEK.
Heimer S; Schmidlin PR; Stawarczyk B
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1191-1200. PubMed ID: 27344329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface Microhardness, Flexural Strength, and Clasp Retention and Deformation of Acetal vs Poly-ether-ether Ketone after Combined Thermal Cycling and pH Aging.
Fathy SM; Emera RMK; Abdallah RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 34257172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of various functional monomers' reaction on the surface characteristics and bonding performance of polyetheretherketone.
Huang HY; Feng SW; Chiang KY; Li YC; Peng TY; Nikawa H
J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Apr; 68(2):319-325. PubMed ID: 37574275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Flexural Strength of Different CAD/CAM PMMA-Based Polymers.
Alp G; Murat S; Yilmaz B
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e491-e495. PubMed ID: 29377319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
